Project homeWiki source code of c. Test
Version 9.1 by William OGrady on 2024/03/25 14:14
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
5.1 | 1 | === 1. Introduction === |
| |
4.1 | 2 | |
| |
5.1 | 3 | The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricated created by us, mimicking lost memories typical of individuals with dementia. |
 |
1.1 | 4 | |
| |
5.2 | 5 | |
 |
2.1 | 6 | === 2. Method === |
| |
1.1 | 7 | |
| |
2.1 | 8 | ==== 2.1 Participants ==== |
| |
1.1 | 9 | |
| |
5.1 | 10 | As actual PwDs are not available for this research, the participants will consist of several student volunteers. These will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (the test group) and those using text-based prompts (the control group). |
| |
1.1 | 11 | |
| 12 | |||
| |
5.1 | 13 | ==== 2.2 Materials ==== |
| |
1.1 | 14 | |
| |
5.2 | 15 | Materials for the test group include the NAO robot, an OpenAI chatbot running on a mobile phone, and a laptop to control the human-like movements of NAO, as described in the [[prototype>>doc:3\. Evaluation.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The control group requires written out text prompts instead. |
| |
5.1 | 16 | Both groups require a set of fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback. ** ** |
| |
1.1 | 17 | |
| 18 | |||
| |
5.1 | 19 | ==== 2.3 Measures ==== |
| |
1.1 | 20 | |
| |
2.1 | 21 | Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness. |
| |
5.1 | 22 | We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values **(link to evaluation in foundation) **such as autonomy and relatedness. |
| |
1.1 | 23 | |
| |
5.1 | 24 | **TODO: More info here once we have the actual evaluation forms (knowledge quiz + emotional questionnaire)** |
| |
1.1 | 25 | |
| 26 | |||
| |
5.1 | 27 | ==== 2.4 Procedure ==== |
| |
1.1 | 28 | |
| |
5.1 | 29 | Participants will receive an overview of their role as a PwD and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction. |
| 30 | |||
| 31 | //**Phase 1: Preparation**// | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | 1. **NAO Robot Setup**: Confirm that Nao is fully operational and our team is equipped to facilitate the interactions by doing a pre-test/trial run with our prototype. | ||
| 34 | 1. **Recruitment and Consent**: Recruit a diverse group of student volunteers, ensuring informed consent for participation. | ||
| 35 | 1. **Training**: Brief participants on their roles and the concept of simulated memory loss without revealing specific details of the fabricated memories. | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | //**Phase 2: Baseline Assessment (Optional)**// | ||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | 1. **Pre-test**: Optionally, assess the students’ ability to recall general information unrelated to the fabricated memories to establish a baseline. | ||
| 40 | 1. **Documentation**: Record responses to analyze as a baseline for later comparison. | ||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | //**Phase 3: Memory Retrieval Test**// | ||
| 43 | |||
| 44 | 1. **Introduction**: Introduce participants in the test group to the NAO robot, explaining its purpose, and provide the control group with their first text-based memory prompt. | ||
| 45 | 1. **Simulation**: Conduct sessions where the test group interacts with Nao aiming to recall a set of fabricated memories. | ||
| 46 | 1. **Analog control group simulation: **Conduct sessions with an analog encyclopedia with equally complex information on relatives. | ||
| 47 | 1. **Memory Quiz**: Following each session, provide a written quiz to both groups based on the memories they were asked to retrieve. | ||
| 48 | 1. **Documentation**: Collect the completed quizzes, which will serve as the primary documentation of memory retrieval. | ||
| 49 | |||
| 50 | //**Phase 4: Evaluation**// | ||
| 51 | |||
| 52 | 1. **Scoring**: Assess the memory quizzes from both groups to evaluate the quantity and accuracy of retrieved memories. | ||
| 53 | 1. **Analysis**: Compare the effectiveness of memory retrieval between the NAO-assisted group and the text-prompt group. | ||
| 54 | 1. **Participant Feedback**: Gather feedback from all participants regarding their experience with the memory retrieval process through a questionnaire. | ||
| 55 | 1. **Observer Notes**: Collect observations from staff regarding the interaction between participants and the Nao robot or text prompts. | ||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | //**Phase 5: Feedback and Improvement**// | ||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | 1. **Participant Reflections**: Review participant feedback for insights into the memory retrieval process and suggestions for improvement. | ||
| 60 | 1. **Staff and Observer Insights**: Analyze observations from staff and observers for additional perspectives on the effectiveness and emotional impact of the interactions. | ||
| 61 | 1. **Improvement Strategies**: Based on the feedback and results, develop a plan to enhance the memory retrieval capabilities of the Nao robot and the overall test design. | ||
| 62 | |||
| 63 | |||
| |
7.1 | 64 | === Ethical Considerations === |
| 65 | |||
| |
5.1 | 66 | We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?** |
| 67 | |||
| 68 |