Changes for page b. Test
Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 7.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/21 21:14
on 2024/03/21 21:14
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 11.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/26 12:29
on 2024/03/26 12:29
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - b. Test1 +c. Test - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki. RixtHellinga1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,12 @@ 1 1 === 1. Introduction === 2 2 3 -Th e aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricated created by us, mimicking lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.3 +This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricated created by us, mimicking lost memories typical of individuals with dementia. 4 4 5 +Recall the image from the [[3. Evaluation Methods>>Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome]] in the [[1. Foundation>>Main.WebHome]] as in the figure below. The first two concepts, that of Autonomy and Relatedness and the memory self-efficacy, will be tested by using validated surveys. The memory recall will be tested by a custom survey that was catered to be used with the robot in the domain of interest, that is of using the NAO as an encyclopedia for recalling familiar people. 5 5 7 +[[image:Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome@Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(4).jpg||height="421" width="735"]] 8 + 9 + 6 6 === 2. Method === 7 7 8 8 ==== 2.1 Participants ==== ... ... @@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ 34 34 1. **Recruitment and Consent**: Recruit a diverse group of student volunteers, ensuring informed consent for participation. 35 35 1. **Training**: Brief participants on their roles and the concept of simulated memory loss without revealing specific details of the fabricated memories. 36 36 37 -//**Phase 2: Baseline Assessment (Optional)**//41 +//**Phase 2: Baseline Assessment**// 38 38 39 39 1. **Pre-test**: Optionally, assess the students’ ability to recall general information unrelated to the fabricated memories to establish a baseline. 40 40 1. **Documentation**: Record responses to analyze as a baseline for later comparison. 41 41 42 -//**Phase 3: Memory Re trievalTest**//46 +//**Phase 3: Memory Recall**// 43 43 44 44 1. **Introduction**: Introduce participants in the test group to the NAO robot, explaining its purpose, and provide the control group with their first text-based memory prompt. 45 45 1. **Simulation**: Conduct sessions where the test group interacts with Nao aiming to recall a set of fabricated memories. ... ... @@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ 60 60 1. **Staff and Observer Insights**: Analyze observations from staff and observers for additional perspectives on the effectiveness and emotional impact of the interactions. 61 61 1. **Improvement Strategies**: Based on the feedback and results, develop a plan to enhance the memory retrieval capabilities of the Nao robot and the overall test design. 62 62 67 +== //**Ethical Considerations**// == 63 63 64 -=== Ethical Considerations === 65 - 66 66 We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?** 67 67 68 68