Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23

From version 5.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/21 21:14
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/21 16:07
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,67 +1,33 @@
1 -=== 1. Introduction ===
1 +=== add in the part where we pre-test the NAO on monday ===
2 2  
3 -The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricated created by us, mimicking lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.
3 +=== ===
4 4  
5 +=== 1. Introduction ===
5 5  
7 +The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval compared to traditional text-based prompts. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of fabricated memories created by us, simulating lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.
8 +
6 6  === 2. Method ===
7 7  
8 8  ==== 2.1 Participants ====
9 9  
10 -As actual PwDs are not available for this research, the participants will consist of several student volunteers. These will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (the test group) and those using text-based prompts (the control group).
13 +Student volunteers will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (Test Group) and those using text-based prompts (Control Group).
11 11  
15 +==== 2.2 Experimental Design ====
12 12  
13 -==== 2.2 Materials ====
17 +The study employs a between-subjects design comparing memory retrieval success between the Test and Control groups under simulated conditions of early-stage dementia.
14 14  
15 -Materials for the test group include the NAO robot, an OpenAI chatbot running on a mobile phone, and a laptop to control the human-like movements of NAO, as described in the [[prototype>>doc:3\. Evaluation.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The control group requires written out text prompts instead.
16 -Both groups require a set of fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback. ** **
19 +==== 2.3 Tasks ====
17 17  
21 +Participants will engage in a simulation intended to mimic the memory retrieval challenges faced by individuals with early-stage dementia, using either the Nao robot or text-based prompts to retrieve fabricated memories.
18 18  
19 -==== 2.3 Measures ====
23 +==== 2.4 Measures ====
20 20  
21 21  Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness.
22 -We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values **(link to evaluation in foundation) **such as autonomy and relatedness.
23 23  
24 -**TODO: More info here once we have the actual evaluation forms (knowledge quiz + emotional questionnaire)**
27 +==== 2.5 Procedure ====
25 25  
29 +Participants will receive an overview of their roles and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction.
26 26  
27 -==== 2.4 Procedure ====
31 +==== 2.6 Material ====
28 28  
29 -Participants will receive an overview of their role as a PwD and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction.
30 -
31 -//**Phase 1: Preparation**//
32 -
33 -1. **NAO Robot Setup**: Confirm that Nao is fully operational and our team is equipped to facilitate the interactions by doing a pre-test/trial run with our prototype.
34 -1. **Recruitment and Consent**: Recruit a diverse group of student volunteers, ensuring informed consent for participation.
35 -1. **Training**: Brief participants on their roles and the concept of simulated memory loss without revealing specific details of the fabricated memories.
36 -
37 -//**Phase 2: Baseline Assessment (Optional)**//
38 -
39 -1. **Pre-test**: Optionally, assess the students’ ability to recall general information unrelated to the fabricated memories to establish a baseline.
40 -1. **Documentation**: Record responses to analyze as a baseline for later comparison.
41 -
42 -//**Phase 3: Memory Retrieval Test**//
43 -
44 -1. **Introduction**: Introduce participants in the test group to the NAO robot, explaining its purpose, and provide the control group with their first text-based memory prompt.
45 -1. **Simulation**: Conduct sessions where the test group interacts with Nao aiming to recall a set of fabricated memories.
46 -1. **Analog control group simulation: **Conduct sessions with an analog encyclopedia with equally complex information on relatives.
47 -1. **Memory Quiz**: Following each session, provide a written quiz to both groups based on the memories they were asked to retrieve.
48 -1. **Documentation**: Collect the completed quizzes, which will serve as the primary documentation of memory retrieval.
49 -
50 -//**Phase 4: Evaluation**//
51 -
52 -1. **Scoring**: Assess the memory quizzes from both groups to evaluate the quantity and accuracy of retrieved memories.
53 -1. **Analysis**: Compare the effectiveness of memory retrieval between the NAO-assisted group and the text-prompt group.
54 -1. **Participant Feedback**: Gather feedback from all participants regarding their experience with the memory retrieval process through a questionnaire.
55 -1. **Observer Notes**: Collect observations from staff regarding the interaction between participants and the Nao robot or text prompts.
56 -
57 -//**Phase 5: Feedback and Improvement**//
58 -
59 -1. **Participant Reflections**: Review participant feedback for insights into the memory retrieval process and suggestions for improvement.
60 -1. **Staff and Observer Insights**: Analyze observations from staff and observers for additional perspectives on the effectiveness and emotional impact of the interactions.
61 -1. **Improvement Strategies**: Based on the feedback and results, develop a plan to enhance the memory retrieval capabilities of the Nao robot and the overall test design.
62 -
63 -=== **Ethical Considerations** ===
64 -
65 -We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?**
66 -
67 -
33 +Materials include the Nao robot, text prompts based on fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback.