Changes for page b. Test
Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 5.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/21 21:06
on 2024/03/21 21:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/03/21 16:07
on 2024/03/21 16:07
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,69 +1,33 @@ 1 -=== 1.Introduction ===1 +=== add in the part where we pre-test the NAO on monday === 2 2 3 3 === === 4 4 5 - Theaim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group.We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants totest whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricatedcreated byus, mimicking lostmemories typicalof individualswith dementia.5 +=== 1. Introduction === 6 6 7 +The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval compared to traditional text-based prompts. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of fabricated memories created by us, simulating lost memories typical of individuals with dementia. 8 + 7 7 === 2. Method === 8 8 9 9 ==== 2.1 Participants ==== 10 10 11 - As actual PwDs are not available for this research, the participants will consist of several student volunteers.Thesewill be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (thetestgroup) and those using text-based prompts (the controlgroup).13 +Student volunteers will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (Test Group) and those using text-based prompts (Control Group). 12 12 15 +==== 2.2 Experimental Design ==== 13 13 14 - ====2.2Materials====17 +The study employs a between-subjects design comparing memory retrieval success between the Test and Control groups under simulated conditions of early-stage dementia. 15 15 16 -Materials for the test group include the NAO robot, an OpenAI chatbot running on a mobile phone, and a laptop to control the human-like movements of NAO, as described in the prototype. The control group requires written out text prompts instead. 17 -Both groups require a set of fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback. ** ** 19 +==== 2.3 Tasks ==== 18 18 21 +Participants will engage in a simulation intended to mimic the memory retrieval challenges faced by individuals with early-stage dementia, using either the Nao robot or text-based prompts to retrieve fabricated memories. 19 19 20 -==== 2. 3Measures ====23 +==== 2.4 Measures ==== 21 21 22 22 Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness. 23 -We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values **(link to evaluation in foundation) **such as autonomy and relatedness. 24 24 25 - **TODO:Moreinfo hereoncewe have the actual evaluation forms (knowledge quiz + emotional questionnaire)**27 +==== 2.5 Procedure ==== 26 26 29 +Participants will receive an overview of their roles and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction. 27 27 28 -==== 2. 4Procedure====31 +==== 2.6 Material ==== 29 29 30 -Participants will receive an overview of their role as a PwD and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction. 31 - 32 -//**Phase 1: Preparation**// 33 - 34 -1. **NAO Robot Setup**: Confirm that Nao is fully operational and our team is equipped to facilitate the interactions by doing a pre-test/trial run with our prototype. 35 -1. **Recruitment and Consent**: Recruit a diverse group of student volunteers, ensuring informed consent for participation. 36 -1. **Training**: Brief participants on their roles and the concept of simulated memory loss without revealing specific details of the fabricated memories. 37 - 38 -//**Phase 2: Baseline Assessment (Optional)**// 39 - 40 -1. **Pre-test**: Optionally, assess the students’ ability to recall general information unrelated to the fabricated memories to establish a baseline. 41 -1. **Documentation**: Record responses to analyze as a baseline for later comparison. 42 - 43 -//**Phase 3: Memory Retrieval Test**// 44 - 45 -1. **Introduction**: Introduce participants in the test group to the NAO robot, explaining its purpose, and provide the control group with their first text-based memory prompt. 46 -1. **Simulation**: Conduct sessions where the test group interacts with Nao aiming to recall a set of fabricated memories. 47 -1. **Analog control group simulation: **Conduct sessions with an analog encyclopedia with equally complex information on relatives. 48 -1. **Memory Quiz**: Following each session, provide a written quiz to both groups based on the memories they were asked to retrieve. 49 -1. **Documentation**: Collect the completed quizzes, which will serve as the primary documentation of memory retrieval. 50 - 51 -//**Phase 4: Evaluation**// 52 - 53 -1. **Scoring**: Assess the memory quizzes from both groups to evaluate the quantity and accuracy of retrieved memories. 54 -1. **Analysis**: Compare the effectiveness of memory retrieval between the NAO-assisted group and the text-prompt group. 55 -1. **Participant Feedback**: Gather feedback from all participants regarding their experience with the memory retrieval process through a questionnaire. 56 -1. **Observer Notes**: Collect observations from staff regarding the interaction between participants and the Nao robot or text prompts. 57 - 58 -//**Phase 5: Feedback and Improvement**// 59 - 60 -1. **Participant Reflections**: Review participant feedback for insights into the memory retrieval process and suggestions for improvement. 61 -1. **Staff and Observer Insights**: Analyze observations from staff and observers for additional perspectives on the effectiveness and emotional impact of the interactions. 62 -1. **Improvement Strategies**: Based on the feedback and results, develop a plan to enhance the memory retrieval capabilities of the Nao robot and the overall test design. 63 - 64 - 65 -=== **Ethical Considerations** === 66 - 67 -We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?** 68 - 69 - 33 +Materials include the Nao robot, text prompts based on fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback.