Changes for page b. Test
Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 35.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/09 15:23
on 2024/04/09 15:23
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 34.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/09 00:32
on 2024/04/09 00:32
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -74,8 +74,13 @@ 74 74 75 75 76 76 77 - The competence ofparticipants, measured with a paired t-test between pre-study and post-study measures found no significant effect on using the NAO (p > 0.05)over the set up with only the conversational agent. Covariates had no significant influence on recall score (p > 0.05). Both student t-tests on the relationship between familiarity and attitude towards robots and conversational agents gave no significant difference between the two group's dependent variables. For other analyses, most resulting p-values had an alpha above 0.05 and thus were not significant enough.77 +Competence. No significant effect on using the NAO (p > 0.05) 78 78 79 +Covariates. had no significant influence on recall score (p > 0.05) 80 + 81 + 82 +For other analyses, most resulting p values had an alpha above 0.05 and thus were not significant enough. 83 + 79 79 [[Table 1: showing the Affect variables>>image:Table of means.png||height="214" width="737"]] 80 80 81 81 === 4. Discussion ===