Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 34.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/09 00:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 36.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/09 15:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -74,13 +74,8 @@
74 74  
75 75  
76 76  
77 -Competence. No significant effect on using the NAO (p > 0.05)
77 +The competence of participants, measured with a paired t-test between pre-study and post-study measures found no significant effect on using the NAO (p > 0.05) over the set up with only the conversational agent. Covariates had no significant influence on recall score (p > 0.05). Both student t-tests on the relationship between familiarity and attitude towards robots and conversational agents gave no significant difference between the two group's dependent variables. For other analyses, most resulting p-values had an alpha above 0.05 and thus were not significant enough.
78 78  
79 -Covariates. had no significant influence on recall score (p > 0.05)
80 -
81 -
82 -For other analyses, most resulting p values had an alpha above 0.05 and thus were not significant enough.
83 -
84 84  [[Table 1: showing the Affect variables>>image:Table of means.png||height="214" width="737"]]
85 85  
86 86  === 4. Discussion ===
... ... @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
90 90  
91 91  **Sample Group and Size impact validity of the study**
92 92  
93 -The ecological validity of the study is impacted by the fact that there were no PwD in our sample. The scope of the experiment was limited to TU Delft University students. That means that future research may benefit from a closer approach to an experiment which is closer to the experience of PwD. Moreover, the controlled experiment was restricted to a cohort of 20 participants, underscoring the potential for enhancing result validity through the utilization of a larger sample size
88 +The ecological validity of the study is impacted by the fact that there were no PwD in our sample. The scope of the experiment was limited to TU Delft University students. That means that future research may benefit from a closer approach to an experiment which is closer to the experience of PwD. Moreover, the controlled experiment was restricted to a cohort of 20 participants, underscoring the potential for enhancing result validity through the utilization of a larger sample size.
94 94  
95 95  
96 96  **//Participants don't know about points system so they didn't answer with "getting the most points" in mind//**