Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 34.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/09 00:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 33.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/09 00:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -119,6 +119,6 @@
119 119  With regards to our final insights, there were some areas of improvement. For example, relating to the validity of the testing procedure, we had a relatively small sample size and none of the participants had Dementia. This means that the target group for this NAO system was not tested. It was also only a specific group of people, namely students with the age range of 20-25. There was also a level of ambiguity in the point system of the evaluation and with regards to the LLM model focus, we found deviations from the GPT regarding the main objective. However, although these were a few of the limitations throughout the process, we were still able to evaluate the NAO system and could recognise that the NAO may positively affects participant’ s affective state.
120 120  
121 121  
122 -===== **//Avenues for Future Work//** =====
122 +===== **//Potential Future Work//** =====
123 123  
124 124  As mentioned, there were some limitations, which could be taken into consideration if wishing to continue work on the Personal Encyclopaedia. For future work, testing can be done on the correct target group, the GPT could be optimised to avoid deviations, and more focus could be placed on our last stage (Extension Phase) to see if additional functionalities are needed!