Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -74,13 +74,8 @@
74	74
75	75
76	76
77		-Competence. No significant effect on using the NAO (p > 0.05)
	77	+The competence of participants, measured with a paired t-test between pre-study and post-study measures found no significant effect on using the NAO (p > 0.05) over the set up with only the conversational agent. Covariates had no significant influence on recall score (p > 0.05). Both student t-tests on the relationship between familiarity and attitude towards robots and conversational agents gave no significant difference between the two group's dependent variables. For other analyses, most resulting p-values had an alpha above 0.05 and thus were not significant enough.
78	78
79		-Covariates. had no significant influence on recall score (p > 0.05)
80		-
81		-
82		-For other analyses, most resulting p values had an alpha above 0.05 and thus were not significant enough.
83		-
84	84	[[Table 1: showing the Affect variables>>image:Table of means.png||height="214" width="737"]]
85	85
86	86	=== 4. Discussion ===
...	...	@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
90	90
91	91	**Sample Group and Size impact validity of the study**
92	92
93		-The ecological validity of the study is impacted by the fact that there were no PwD in our sample. The scope of the experiment was limited to TU Delft University students. That means that future research may benefit from a closer approach to an experiment which is closer to the experience of PwD. Moreover, the controlled experiment was restricted to a cohort of 20 participants, underscoring the potential for enhancing result validity through the utilization of a larger sample size
	88	+The ecological validity of the study is impacted by the fact that there were no PwD in our sample. The scope of the experiment was limited to TU Delft University students. That means that future research may benefit from a closer approach to an experiment which is closer to the experience of PwD. Moreover, the controlled experiment was restricted to a cohort of 20 participants, underscoring the potential for enhancing result validity through the utilization of a larger sample size.
94	94
95	95
96	96	**//Participants don't know about points system so they didn't answer with "getting the most points" in mind//**
...	...	@@ -119,6 +119,6 @@
119	119	With regards to our final insights, there were some areas of improvement. For example, relating to the validity of the testing procedure, we had a relatively small sample size and none of the participants had Dementia. This means that the target group for this NAO system was not tested. It was also only a specific group of people, namely students with the age range of 20-25. There was also a level of ambiguity in the point system of the evaluation and with regards to the LLM model focus, we found deviations from the GPT regarding the main objective. However, although these were a few of the limitations throughout the process, we were still able to evaluate the NAO system and could recognise that the NAO may positively affects participant’ s affective state.
120	120
121	121
122		-===== **//Potential Future Work//** =====
	117	+===== **//Avenues for Future Work//** =====
123	123
124	124	As mentioned, there were some limitations, which could be taken into consideration if wishing to continue work on the Personal Encyclopaedia. For future work, testing can be done on the correct target group, the GPT could be optimised to avoid deviations, and more focus could be placed on our last stage (Extension Phase) to see if additional functionalities are needed!