Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 30.1
edited by Pravesha Ramsundersingh
on 2024/04/08 11:02
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 31.1
edited by Diederik Heijbroek
on 2024/04/08 20:12
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.PraveshaRamsundersingh
1 +xwiki:XWiki.DiederikHeijbroek
Content
... ... @@ -95,17 +95,17 @@
95 95  
96 96  **//Participants don't know about points system so they didn't answer with "getting the most points" in mind//**
97 97  
98 -//Ambiguities in the evaluation briefing has led to several aspects in the results that might misrepresent the participants' gathered knowledge. Points were awarded to the participant for certain key descriptors, each family member's role, occupation, likes, dislikes and so on. Of course, this wasn't known to the participants, so they might have omitted descriptors they deemed less important or trivial and therefore scored worse, even though they'd heard and remembered them.//
98 +Ambiguities in the evaluation briefing has led to several aspects in the results that might misrepresent the participants' gathered knowledge. Points were awarded to the participant for certain key descriptors, each family member's role, occupation, likes, dislikes and so on. Of course, this wasn't known to the participants, so they might have omitted descriptors they deemed less important or trivial and therefore scored worse, even though they'd heard and remembered them.
99 99  
100 100  
101 101  //**Participants don't know which people or facts are important, so they can get stuck in spots that are unrewarded**//
102 102  
103 -//The choice to create a sprawling, multi-faceted database also had the side-effect of participants finding out a lot of information that was not rewarded by the grading system in any way. For example, the user can ask the robot to elaborate on certain memories or character traits of family members. There are also people in the database that act as ancillary characters and to create a sense of realism to the database, but participants can likely get stuck on learning about them as there is no implied hierarchy of importance to the participant. //
103 +The choice to create a sprawling, multi-faceted database also had the side-effect of participants finding out a lot of information that was not rewarded by the grading system in any way. For example, the user can ask the robot to elaborate on certain memories or character traits of family members. There are also people in the database that act as ancillary characters and to create a sense of realism to the database, but participants can likely get stuck on learning about them as there is no implied hierarchy of importance to the participant.
104 104  
105 105  
106 106  **//GPT Assistant can elaborate on any question, and therefore the user does not know what belongs to the database and don't know where to focus//**
107 107  
108 -//Another limitation of the evaluation is with the GPT Assistant's ability to consistently elaborate on any question posed by the participant.//
108 +Another limitation of the evaluation is with the GPT Assistant's ability to consistently elaborate on any question posed by the participant.
109 109  
110 110  
111 111  (% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HEthicalConsiderations" %)