Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 28.1
edited by Pravesha Ramsundersingh
on 2024/04/08 10:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 27.1
edited by Pravesha Ramsundersingh
on 2024/04/08 10:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -108,19 +108,16 @@
108 108  //Another limitation of the evaluation is with the GPT Assistant's ability to consistently elaborate on any question posed by the participant.//
109 109  
110 110  
111 -===== =====
112 112  
113 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HEthicalConsiderations" %)
114 -//**Ethical Considerations**//
112 +=== 5. Conclusions ===
115 115  
116 -We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant.
114 +===== //**Ethical Considerations**// =====
117 117  
116 +We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant.
118 118  
119 -=== 5. Conclusions ===
120 120  
121 121  ===== //**Final Remarks**// =====
122 122  
123 123  With regards to our final insights, there were some areas of improvement. For example, relating to the validity of the testing procedure, we had a relatively small sample size and none of the participants had dementia. This means that the target group for this NAO system was not tested. It was also only a specific group of people, namely students with the age range of 20-25. There was also a level of ambiguity in the point system of the evaluation and with regards to the LLM model focus, we found deviations from the GPT regarding the main objective. However, although these were a few of the limitations throughout the process, we were still able to evaluate the NAO system and could recognise that the NAO may positively affects participant’ s affective state.
124 124  
125 -
126 126  ===== **//Potential Future Work//** =====