Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -108,16 +108,19 @@
108	108	//Another limitation of the evaluation is with the GPT Assistant's ability to consistently elaborate on any question posed by the participant.//
109	109
110	110
	111	+===== =====
111	111
112		-=== 5. Conclusions ===
	113	+(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HEthicalConsiderations" %)
	114	+//**Ethical Considerations**//
113	113
114		-===== //**Ethical Considerations**// =====
	116	+We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant.
115	115
116		-We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant.
117	117
	119	+=== 5. Conclusions ===
118	118
119	119	===== //**Final Remarks**// =====
120	120
121	121	With regards to our final insights, there were some areas of improvement. For example, relating to the validity of the testing procedure, we had a relatively small sample size and none of the participants had dementia. This means that the target group for this NAO system was not tested. It was also only a specific group of people, namely students with the age range of 20-25. There was also a level of ambiguity in the point system of the evaluation and with regards to the LLM model focus, we found deviations from the GPT regarding the main objective. However, although these were a few of the limitations throughout the process, we were still able to evaluate the NAO system and could recognise that the NAO may positively affects participant’ s affective state.
122	122
	125	+
123	123	===== **//Potential Future Work//** =====