Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 24.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/07 00:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 25.2
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/07 00:25
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -67,12 +67,18 @@
67 67  
68 68  Twenty University students participated in the controlled experiment (M= 45%, F=55%). After gaining consent through the consent form, all participants were briefed to act as if experiencing the interaction from the viewpoint of a PwD. From the sample, half were asked to interact with the NAO and half were only using a voice-based version of the encyclopedia prototype.
69 69  
70 -The main finding of the experiment can be seen in Table 1: the increase of affect in both Arousal and Valence dimensions during the experiment with the test group was higher than the experiment with the control group. The control group mean values in arousal and valence show no significant change at all.
70 +The main finding of the experiment is on Relatedness as can be seen in Table 1: the increase of affect in both Arousal and Valence dimensions during the experiment with the test group was higher than the experiment with the control group. The control group mean values in arousal and valence show no significant change at all.
71 71  
72 72  
73 73  [[Figure 3: Pie chart showing the gender distribution of our sample. ~| Figure 4: Boxplot chart showing the familiarity with robots and the attitude towards technology.>>image:gender & familiarity.png]]
74 74  
75 75  
76 +
77 +Competence. No significant effect on using the NAO (p > 0.05)
78 +
79 +Covariates. had no significant influence on recall score (p > 0.05)
80 +
81 +
76 76  For other analyses, most resulting p values had an alpha above 0.05 and thus were not significant enough.
77 77  
78 78  [[Table 1: showing the Affect variables>>image:Table of means.png||height="214" width="737"]]
... ... @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
79 79  
80 80  === 4. Discussion ===
81 81  
88 +The NAO may positively affects participant’ s affective state. Yet the other results were not significant enough to make a valid decision about. There are a few possible reasons why that is that will be elaborated upon in this section.
89 +
90 +
82 82  **Sample Group and Size impact validity of the study**
83 83  
84 84  The ecological validity of the study is impacted by the fact that there were no PwD in our sample. The scope of the experiment was limited to TU Delft University students. That means that future research may benefit from a closer approach to an experiment which is closer to the experience of PwD. Moreover, the controlled experiment was restricted to a cohort of 20 participants, underscoring the potential for enhancing result validity through the utilization of a larger sample size
... ... @@ -105,4 +105,3 @@
105 105  ===== //**Ethical Considerations**// =====
106 106  
107 107  We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant.
108 -
Test group data.jpg
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +157.5 KB
Content