Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 21.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/04/05 22:02
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 23.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/06 14:29
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.RixtHellinga
1 +xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
Content
... ... @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
22 22  
23 23  ==== 2.3 Measures ====
24 24  
25 -Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness. We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values** **such as autonomy and relatedness. The link to the quiz and concrete assignment posed to the participants can be found here. **TODO: put in link**
25 +Memory retrieval success will be measured using a [[quiz>>doc:.Quiz.WebHome]] based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness. We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values** **such as autonomy and relatedness.
26 26  
27 27  
28 28  ==== 2.4 Procedure ====
... ... @@ -66,6 +66,11 @@
66 66  
67 67  === 4. Discussion ===
68 68  
69 +**Sample Group and Size impact validity of the study**
70 +
71 +The ecological validity of the study is impacted by the fact that there were no PwD in our sample.The scope of the experiment was limited to TU Delft University students. That means that future research may benefit from a closer approach to an experiment which is closer to the experience of PwD. Moreover, the controlled experiment was restricted to a cohort of 20 participants, underscoring the potential for enhancing result validity through the utilization of a larger sample size
72 +
73 +
69 69  **//Participants don't know about points system so they didn't answer with "getting the most points" in mind//**
70 70  
71 71  //Ambiguities in the evaluation briefing has led to several aspects in the results that might misrepresent the participants' gathered knowledge. Points were awarded to the participant for certain key descriptors, each family member's role, occupation, likes, dislikes and so on. Of course, this wasn't known to the participant, so they might have omitted descriptors they deemed less important or trivial and therefore scored worse, even though they'd heard and remembered them.//