Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-b. Test
	1	+c. Test

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.KrisVanMelis
	1	+xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit

Content

...	...	@@ -1,38 +1,71 @@
1	1	=== 1. Introduction ===
2	2
3		-The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval compared to traditional text-based prompts. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of fabricated memories created by us, simulating lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.
	3	+This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricated created by us, mimicking lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.
4	4
	5	+Recall the image from the [[3. Evaluation Methods>>Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome]] in the [[1. Foundation>>Main.WebHome]] as in the figure below. The first two concepts, that of Autonomy and Relatedness and the memory self-efficacy, will be tested by using validated surveys. The memory recall will be tested by a custom survey that was catered to be used with the robot in the domain of interest, that is of using the NAO as an encyclopedia for recalling familiar people.
	6	+
	7	+[[image:Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome@Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(4).jpg||height="421" width="735"]]
	8	+
	9	+
5	5	=== 2. Method ===
6	6
7	7	==== 2.1 Participants ====
8	8
9		-Student volunteers will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (Test Group) and those using text-based prompts (Control Group).
	14	+As actual PwDs are not available for this research, the participants will consist of several student volunteers. These will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (the test group) and those using text-based prompts (the control group).
10	10
11		-==== 2.2 Experimental Design ====
12	12
13		-The study employs a between-subjects design comparing memory retrieval success between the Test and Control groups under simulated conditions of early-stage dementia.
	17	+==== 2.2 Materials ====
14	14
15		-==== 2.3 Tasks ====
	19	+Materials for the test group include the NAO robot, an OpenAI chatbot running on a mobile phone, and a laptop to control the human-like movements of NAO, as described in the [[prototype>>doc:3\. Evaluation.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The control group requires written out text prompts instead.
	20	+Both groups require a set of fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback. ** **
16	16
17		-Participants will engage in a simulation intended to mimic the memory retrieval challenges faced by individuals with early-stage dementia, using either the Nao robot or text-based prompts to retrieve fabricated memories.
18	18
19		-==== 2.4 Measures ====
	23	+==== 2.3 Measures ====
20	20
21	21	Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness.
	26	+We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values **(link to evaluation in foundation) **such as autonomy and relatedness.
22	22
23		-==== 2.5 Procedure ====
	28	+**TODO: More info here once we have the actual evaluation forms (knowledge quiz + emotional questionnaire)**
24	24
25		-Participants will receive an overview of their roles and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction.
26	26
27		-==== 2.6 Material ====
	31	+==== 2.4 Procedure ====
28	28
29		-Materials include the Nao robot, text prompts based on fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback.
	33	+Participants will receive an overview of their role as a PwD and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction.
30	30
	35	+//**Phase 1: Preparation**//
31	31
32		-= 3. Results =
	37	+1. **NAO Robot Setup**: Confirm that Nao is fully operational and our team is equipped to facilitate the interactions by doing a pre-test/trial run with our prototype.
	38	+1. **Recruitment and Consent**: Recruit a diverse group of student volunteers, ensuring informed consent for participation.
	39	+1. **Training**: Brief participants on their roles and the concept of simulated memory loss without revealing specific details of the fabricated memories.
33	33
	41	+//**Phase 2: Baseline Assessment**//
34	34
35		-= 4. Discussion =
	43	+1. **Pre-test**: Optionally, assess the students’ ability to recall general information unrelated to the fabricated memories to establish a baseline.
	44	+1. **Documentation**: Record responses to analyze as a baseline for later comparison.
36	36
	46	+//**Phase 3: Memory Recall**//
37	37
38		-= 5. Conclusions =
	48	+1. **Introduction**: Introduce participants in the test group to the NAO robot, explaining its purpose, and provide the control group with their first text-based memory prompt.
	49	+1. **Simulation**: Conduct sessions where the test group interacts with Nao aiming to recall a set of fabricated memories.
	50	+1. **Analog control group simulation: **Conduct sessions with an analog encyclopedia with equally complex information on relatives.
	51	+1. **Memory Quiz**: Following each session, provide a written quiz to both groups based on the memories they were asked to retrieve.
	52	+1. **Documentation**: Collect the completed quizzes, which will serve as the primary documentation of memory retrieval.
	53	+
	54	+//**Phase 4: Evaluation**//
	55	+
	56	+1. **Scoring**: Assess the memory quizzes from both groups to evaluate the quantity and accuracy of retrieved memories.
	57	+1. **Analysis**: Compare the effectiveness of memory retrieval between the NAO-assisted group and the text-prompt group.
	58	+1. **Participant Feedback**: Gather feedback from all participants regarding their experience with the memory retrieval process through a questionnaire.
	59	+1. **Observer Notes**: Collect observations from staff regarding the interaction between participants and the Nao robot or text prompts.
	60	+
	61	+//**Phase 5: Feedback and Improvement**//
	62	+
	63	+1. **Participant Reflections**: Review participant feedback for insights into the memory retrieval process and suggestions for improvement.
	64	+1. **Staff and Observer Insights**: Analyze observations from staff and observers for additional perspectives on the effectiveness and emotional impact of the interactions.
	65	+1. **Improvement Strategies**: Based on the feedback and results, develop a plan to enhance the memory retrieval capabilities of the Nao robot and the overall test design.
	66	+
	67	+== //**Ethical Considerations**// ==
	68	+
	69	+We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?**
	70	+
	71	+