Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 15.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/04/01 12:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 20.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/04/01 16:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -c. Test
1 +b. Test
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
1 +xwiki:XWiki.RixtHellinga
Content
... ... @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2 2  
3 3  This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricated created by us, mimicking lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.
4 4  
5 -Recall the image from the [[3. Evaluation Methods>>Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome]] in the [[1. Foundation>>Main.WebHome]] as in the figure below. The first two concepts, that of Autonomy and Relatedness and the memory self-efficacy, will be tested by using validated surveys. The memory recall will be tested by a custom survey that was catered to be used with the robot in the domain of interest, that is of using the NAO as an encyclopedia for recalling familiar people.
5 +Recall the image from the [[3. Evaluation Methods>>Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome]] as in the figure below. The first two concepts, that of Autonomy and Relatedness and the memory self-efficacy, will be tested by using validated surveys. The memory recall will be tested by a custom survey that was catered to be used with the robot in the domain of interest, that is of using the NAO as an encyclopedia for recalling familiar people.
6 6  
7 7  [[image:Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1.jpg]]
8 8  
... ... @@ -22,12 +22,9 @@
22 22  
23 23  ==== 2.3 Measures ====
24 24  
25 -Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness.
26 -We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values **(link to evaluation in foundation) **such as autonomy and relatedness.
25 +Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness. We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values** **such as autonomy and relatedness. The link to the quiz and concrete assignment posed to the participants can be found here. **TODO: put in link**
27 27  
28 -**TODO: More info here once we have the actual evaluation forms (knowledge quiz + emotional questionnaire)**
29 29  
30 -
31 31  ==== 2.4 Procedure ====
32 32  
33 33  Participants will receive an overview of their role as a PwD and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction.
... ... @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
87 87  
88 88  === 5. Conclusions ===
89 89  
90 -== //**Ethical Considerations**// ==
87 +===== //**Ethical Considerations**// =====
91 91  
92 92  We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?**
93 93