Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-c. Test
	1	+b. Test

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
	1	+xwiki:XWiki.KrisVanMelis

Content

...	...	@@ -1,71 +1,38 @@
1	1	=== 1. Introduction ===
2	2
3		-This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval through the use of a between-subjects design with a test group and a control group. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of memories fabricated created by us, mimicking lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.
	3	+The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nao robot in aiding memory retrieval compared to traditional text-based prompts. We will simulate conditions of early-stage dementia in student participants to test whether interactions with Nao enhance the retrieval of fabricated memories created by us, simulating lost memories typical of individuals with dementia.
4	4
5		-Recall the image from the [[3. Evaluation Methods>>Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome]] in the [[1. Foundation>>Main.WebHome]] as in the figure below. The first two concepts, that of Autonomy and Relatedness and the memory self-efficacy, will be tested by using validated surveys. The memory recall will be tested by a custom survey that was catered to be used with the robot in the domain of interest, that is of using the NAO as an encyclopedia for recalling familiar people.
6		-
7		-[[image:Main.b\. Human Factors.Measuring Instruments.WebHome@Socio-Cognitive Engineering - Frame 1(4).jpg||height="421" width="735"]]
8		-
9		-
10	10	=== 2. Method ===
11	11
12	12	==== 2.1 Participants ====
13	13
14		-As actual PwDs are not available for this research, the participants will consist of several student volunteers. These will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (the test group) and those using text-based prompts (the control group).
	9	+Student volunteers will be divided into two groups: those using the Nao robot for memory retrieval (Test Group) and those using text-based prompts (Control Group).
15	15
	11	+==== 2.2 Experimental Design ====
16	16
17		-==== 2.2 Materials ====
	13	+The study employs a between-subjects design comparing memory retrieval success between the Test and Control groups under simulated conditions of early-stage dementia.
18	18
19		-Materials for the test group include the NAO robot, an OpenAI chatbot running on a mobile phone, and a laptop to control the human-like movements of NAO, as described in the [[prototype>>doc:3\. Evaluation.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The control group requires written out text prompts instead.
20		-Both groups require a set of fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback. ** **
	15	+==== 2.3 Tasks ====
21	21
	17	+Participants will engage in a simulation intended to mimic the memory retrieval challenges faced by individuals with early-stage dementia, using either the Nao robot or text-based prompts to retrieve fabricated memories.
22	22
23		-==== 2.3 Measures ====
	19	+==== 2.4 Measures ====
24	24
25	25	Memory retrieval success will be measured using a quiz based on the fabricated memories. Participant feedback and observational notes will also be collected to assess the user experience and interaction effectiveness.
26		-We will evaluate the recall and memory-efficacy of both groups and try to relate the given answers to values **(link to evaluation in foundation) **such as autonomy and relatedness.
27	27
28		-**TODO: More info here once we have the actual evaluation forms (knowledge quiz + emotional questionnaire)**
	23	+==== 2.5 Procedure ====
29	29
	25	+Participants will receive an overview of their roles and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction.
30	30
31		-==== 2.4 Procedure ====
	27	+==== 2.6 Material ====
32	32
33		-Participants will receive an overview of their role as a PwD and undergo a session with either Nao or text prompts to retrieve memories. Following the session, they will complete the memory quiz. Feedback will be gathered post-interaction.
	29	+Materials include the Nao robot, text prompts based on fabricated memories, memory quizzes, writing materials, and evaluation forms for feedback.
34	34
35		-//**Phase 1: Preparation**//
36	36
37		-1. **NAO Robot Setup**: Confirm that Nao is fully operational and our team is equipped to facilitate the interactions by doing a pre-test/trial run with our prototype.
38		-1. **Recruitment and Consent**: Recruit a diverse group of student volunteers, ensuring informed consent for participation.
39		-1. **Training**: Brief participants on their roles and the concept of simulated memory loss without revealing specific details of the fabricated memories.
	32	+= 3. Results =
40	40
41		-//**Phase 2: Baseline Assessment**//
42	42
43		-1. **Pre-test**: Optionally, assess the students’ ability to recall general information unrelated to the fabricated memories to establish a baseline.
44		-1. **Documentation**: Record responses to analyze as a baseline for later comparison.
	35	+= 4. Discussion =
45	45
46		-//**Phase 3: Memory Recall**//
47	47
48		-1. **Introduction**: Introduce participants in the test group to the NAO robot, explaining its purpose, and provide the control group with their first text-based memory prompt.
49		-1. **Simulation**: Conduct sessions where the test group interacts with Nao aiming to recall a set of fabricated memories.
50		-1. **Analog control group simulation: **Conduct sessions with an analog encyclopedia with equally complex information on relatives.
51		-1. **Memory Quiz**: Following each session, provide a written quiz to both groups based on the memories they were asked to retrieve.
52		-1. **Documentation**: Collect the completed quizzes, which will serve as the primary documentation of memory retrieval.
53		-
54		-//**Phase 4: Evaluation**//
55		-
56		-1. **Scoring**: Assess the memory quizzes from both groups to evaluate the quantity and accuracy of retrieved memories.
57		-1. **Analysis**: Compare the effectiveness of memory retrieval between the NAO-assisted group and the text-prompt group.
58		-1. **Participant Feedback**: Gather feedback from all participants regarding their experience with the memory retrieval process through a questionnaire.
59		-1. **Observer Notes**: Collect observations from staff regarding the interaction between participants and the Nao robot or text prompts.
60		-
61		-//**Phase 5: Feedback and Improvement**//
62		-
63		-1. **Participant Reflections**: Review participant feedback for insights into the memory retrieval process and suggestions for improvement.
64		-1. **Staff and Observer Insights**: Analyze observations from staff and observers for additional perspectives on the effectiveness and emotional impact of the interactions.
65		-1. **Improvement Strategies**: Based on the feedback and results, develop a plan to enhance the memory retrieval capabilities of the Nao robot and the overall test design.
66		-
67		-== //**Ethical Considerations**// ==
68		-
69		-We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?**
70		-
71		-
	38	+= 5. Conclusions =