Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Jean-Paul Smit on 2024/04/09 15:23
From version 11.1
edited by Jean-Paul Smit
on 2024/03/26 12:29
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 12.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/03/29 11:39
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.jeanpaulsmit
1 +xwiki:XWiki.WilliamOGrady
Content
... ... @@ -64,6 +64,18 @@
64 64  1. **Staff and Observer Insights**: Analyze observations from staff and observers for additional perspectives on the effectiveness and emotional impact of the interactions.
65 65  1. **Improvement Strategies**: Based on the feedback and results, develop a plan to enhance the memory retrieval capabilities of the Nao robot and the overall test design.
66 66  
67 +=== 3. Results ===
68 +
69 +
70 +=== 4. Discussion ===
71 +
72 +//Ambiguities in the evaluation briefing has led to several aspects in the results that might misrepresent the participants' gathered knowledge. Points were awarded to the participant for certain key descriptors, each family member's role, occupation, likes, dislikes and so on. Of course, this wasn't known to the participant, so they might have omitted descriptors they deemed less important or trivial and therefore scored worse, even though they'd heard and remembered them.//
73 +
74 +//The choice to create a sprawling, multi-faceted database also had the side-effect of participants finding out a lot of information that was not rewarded by the grading system in any way. For example, the user can ask the robot to elaborate about certain memories or character traits of family members. There are also people in the database that act as ancillary characters and to create a sense of realism to the database, but participants can likely get stuck on learning about them as there is no implied hiearchy of importance to the participant. //
75 +
76 +
77 +=== 5. Conclusions ===
78 +
67 67  == //**Ethical Considerations**// ==
68 68  
69 69  We commit to high ethical standards, respecting the sensitive nature of simulating dementia conditions, and ensuring the well-being and dignity of all participants throughout the study. To ensure this we present a form containing the ethical considerations to each participant. **TODO: put in link to ethics form?**