Wiki source code of 3. Evaluation
Version 4.1 by Kris van Melis on 2024/03/11 17:06
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| |
2.1 | 1 | NOTES; |
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | We are testing out use-case 2. | ||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | Setup: | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | We get random test persons. The person get the role of someone with early stage dementia who has forgotten relationship (we might have to specifically focus on memory). | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | the person's goal is to find out as much information as possible from the memory bank of a person don't know. | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | we mainly test if the robot and the implemtation is effective in memory retrieval. | ||
| |
3.1 | 16 | |
| 17 | |||
| |
4.1 | 18 | We ONLY test with students, not PwD. |
| |
3.1 | 19 | |
| 20 | |||
| 21 | PILOT STUDY!!! | ||
| |
4.1 | 22 | |
| 23 | |||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | Task list: | ||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | 0. What do we want to evaluate? | ||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | a. work out what use case we want to evaluate and what assumptions/claim we want to test. | ||
| 31 | |||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | ~1. Write down test proposal & content | ||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | a. introduction information | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | b. how it gets processed | ||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | c. informed consent and they can leave any time etc | ||
| 40 | |||
| 41 | d. questions for evaluation of system | ||
| 42 | |||
| 43 | e. data analysis we are going to do | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | 2. Ethical approval from that one board at the TU Delft | ||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | 3. implement test for robot | ||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | 4. evaluate with students | ||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | |||
| 52 |