Skip to Content

Changes for page William Reflection

Last modified by William OGrady on 2024/04/09 14:36
From version 8.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/05 14:05
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 5.1
edited by William OGrady
on 2024/04/04 16:12
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -22,19 +22,19 @@
22 22  
23 23  **Week 5**
24 24  
25 -More work on the xWiki and started looking at implementation with Diederik. We spent time testing the efficacy of //Robots in de Klas (RidK) //and then investigated alternate ways, like the Social Robotics library for python. We never got it working so decided to hard code a database in //RidK. //I made a rudimentary database in Google Sheets.
25 +More work on the xWiki and started looking at implementation with Diederik. We spent time testing the efficacy of //Robots in de Klas //and then investigated alternate ways of
26 26  
27 27  
28 28  **Week 6**
29 29  
30 -This week's biggest decision was to abandon the //RidK-//implementation for a custom GPT assistant, using the voice function that had been released only a few weeks prior. The decision was made because although this meant separating the prototype into two components, the robot and the smartphone, the prototype would be closer to what was envisioned. Hardcoding the conversations would not demonstrate the natural conversation element in a suitable fashion. The element is the most important in the project. This change made it easier to use the database, as the GPT assistant can import excel files. We planned to have pilot studies done that weekend but this fell through.
30 +finalising evaluation plan & database, switching to gpt
31 31  
32 32  
33 33  **Week 7**
34 34  
35 -This week we did the pilot study and the evaluation. My job was documenting the evaluation by taking pictures and recording some videos, mostly for the presentation. I also took time to make every page on the xWiki a bit cleaner and consistent, using the same font size and cutting down paragraphs to avoid excessive repetition. The aim was that reading the xWiki should be no different then reading a regular project report.
35 +evaluation
36 36  
37 37  
38 38  **Week 8**
39 39  
40 -Week 8 we had our final presentation, we also planned final xWiki runthrough by creating google document with notes for each page. Conditions for a good xWiki included: ~-~-
40 +Final presentation