Skip to Content

Changes for page Rixt Reflection

Last modified by Rixt Hellinga on 2024/04/09 11:17
From version 1.1
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/04/09 09:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.2
edited by Rixt Hellinga
on 2024/04/09 10:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,17 @@
1 +== [Draft] ==
2 +
3 +started first week with not that great idea of what the course was, had first lecture to sort of explain it
4 +
5 +Got the feeling we were a little behind, mostly focussed on quick start. we had a rough idea (personal encyclopedia) but were definitely missing some details
6 +
7 +then started on foundation a little and worked on human factors, also required me to really think about socio cognitive engineering and the influence of engineering on humans
8 +
9 +Went on to use cases, were still a little iffy on the details. Figured that we should have figured it out at the quickstart, but we would have needed some more time for that. And instead of figuring out the entire functions/claims/effects structure, we should have laid out the details of our idea first.
10 +
11 +Had some issues with filling in effects too, thinking in 'smaller' and more specific effects was a little difficult. We also started noticing there was a lot of repetition, which seems easy but tends to work counterproductive because if you don't have everything to exact detail, then repeating stuff will create divergence in the idea
12 +
13 +We needed a little more clear discussing on the testing ideas in hindsight, but this is what happens in a little too large group.
14 +
15 +It was also at this point that I started noticing that the testing our idea with 'relevant' results would be hard, considering the time and material limits. Not only did we not get NAO working immediately, and was it not as detailed in its movements as we wanted, and there really was not enough time to get a significant (>30) amount of testers and control group. So it felt a little redundant to do a test; It would not get relevant results and 'learning' to test seemed a little late for our Master's degree. I would have preferred to dive deeper into the human factors part and the theory and maybe a little more into different types of emotional questionnaires?
16 +
17 +