Changes for page 2. Stakeholders
Last modified by Michaël Grauwde on 2023/05/02 17:12
From version 4.1
edited by Michaël Grauwde
on 2023/02/28 16:04
on 2023/02/28 16:04
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 7.1
edited by Michaël Grauwde
on 2023/05/02 17:12
on 2023/05/02 17:12
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ 1 -The stakeholders in this conversational agent are themunicipality, the police, and the public.1 +The stakeholders in this conversational agent are municipalities, the police, industry, academia, and the public. 2 2 3 - Inthis case,theconversationalagentwillbemaintainedbythemunicipality.While the police andthe emergencyserviceswillbe responsible with thedispatchingof emergency servicesto the affectedpublic.3 +We are interested in how the different stakeholders may communicate with each other and how their different places in society can cause them to have different perspectives from one another. However, we hope that with the conversational agent, they will still be able to deliberate in a civil manner and build consensus. 4 4 5 -As such, there is a requirement for the municipality and the police to communicate the usefulness and the necessity of the conversational agent in the first instance. From there, the technology can begin to be trusted by the public. It is important that in the design framework, the public is also involved in the design and as such, it is created as a truly participatory system. As such, the public and their value-inputs are very important for the design and should be taken into account. 5 +In that vein, we hope to have various stakeholders such as AI-engineers, policemen and policewomen, ELSA researchers, developers for private companies, as well as civil society representatives. 6 + 7 +We want to make a conversational agent that can reflect the values of this broad group back towards them and in so doing we can foster deliberation based on these reflections.