Last modified by Michaël Grauwde on 2023/05/04 18:59

From version 1.1
edited by Ruud de Jong
on 2023/02/13 13:09
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 2.1
edited by Michaël Grauwde
on 2023/03/26 21:00
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.RuuddeJong
1 +XWiki.grauwde
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@
1 +Based on interdisciplinary research from social sciences, such as cognitive psychology into the creation of human-machine systems which became situated cognitive engineering. The design rationale expounds the the design with. Situated cognitive engineering is focused on the specifications of the claims on the agent’s functions in particular use cases. It focuses on developing the design for the behaviour of the agent (Neerincx et al., 2019). Socio-cognitive engineering however, focuses on the ability of social processes and human-technology relationships to be transformed to focus on better human-agent relationships. SCE is hypothesised as a methodology that can help support the relationship between human-agent intelligence and the evolution of social intelligence (Neerincx et al., 2019).
2 +
3 +The methodology puts emphasis on the importance of interactions with the agent in specific social context to build a shared knowledge base of the human and the agent. This allows opportunities for improvement and iterative learning (Neerincx et al., 2019). In this way, SCE is similar to existing methodologies such as Value-Sensitive Design that allow for improvement and also has a similar iterative process.
4 +
5 +This design of this conversational agent is based on an interdisciplinary approach. This was a necessary requirement as values is important when interacting with multiple stakeholders and dealing with the public. Furthermore, the design also takes from literature on deliberation processes to examine the best way in which a conversational agent can assist in deliberation.