Project homeWiki source code of f. Effects
Last modified by Michaël Grauwde on 2023/05/08 01:57
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |(% style="width:113px" %)**Upside**|(% style="width:705px" %)((( | ||
| 2 | Why is deliberation important? Why is it important to have value-aligned systems? | ||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | On the impact of CA's in negotiations and then deliberations and show what we expect! | ||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | **What our claims are!** | ||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | The system can allow for the emergence of revealed preferences. | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | Through value reflection, the system can enable better deliberation amongst the various stakeholders. | ||
| 14 | ))) | ||
| 15 | |(% style="width:113px" %)**Downside**|(% style="width:705px" %)((( | ||
| 16 | If there is a lack of trust in the conversational agent, or the stakeholder believes that they have been given an incorrect value judgement, they may not trust the system. This can lead to problems in the ensuing deliberation. | ||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | The system can also possibly lead to a rift between stakeholders if they fail to understand or deliberate in a civil manner. | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | The stakeholders can get stuck in an echo chamber regarding the values that are attached to them. | ||
| 21 | ))) | ||
| 22 | |(% style="width:113px" %)**Use Cases**|(% style="width:705px" %)((( | ||
| 23 | The use cases that we are used are based on a crowd control scenario, more specifically, a protest. In this scenario, we have divided our use cases into three sections. | ||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | The section prior the interaction with the conversational agent; the first interaction between the conversational agent and the user; the second interaction between the conversational agent and the user that places the user in a scenario. | ||
| 26 | ))) | ||
| 27 | |(% style="width:113px" %)**Tests**|(% style="width:705px" %) |