Skip to Content

Changes for page 4. Evaluation Methods

Last modified by Mohamed Elsayed on 2023/04/11 15:15
From version 10.1
edited by Mohamed Elsayed
on 2023/04/11 15:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 11.1
edited by Mohamed Elsayed
on 2023/04/11 15:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -14,6 +14,22 @@
14 14  
15 15  Subjective measurements and questionnaires are best fit to evaluate the project. A set of questions will be formulated and used in a questionnaire that participants can fill in after the experiment. The questions can be found [[here>>doc:3\. Evaluation.b\. Test.Questionaire Questions.WebHome]].
16 16  
17 +A trust score, as described in Gutalli et al. (2019) //(Design, development and evaluation of a human-computer trust scale)//, the effect on the mood of the participant was measured using a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of sub-questions related to these aspects and used a 1-5 Likert Scale to capture the level of agreement and feelings towards these aspects.
17 17  
19 +According to Gulati et al. (2019), the trust people have in robots consist of 4 different factors:
18 18  
21 +//1) The Percieved Risk of the Robot~:// This indicates how cautious people feel they have to be around the robot, or how risky they feel it is to interact with the robot. This score inverted shows how much people trust a robot.
22 +
23 +//2) The Benevolence of the Robot: //This score shows how much people think a robot will act in their best interests.
24 +
25 +//3) The Competence of the Robot: //This shows how well people think the robot is fit for its job.
26 +
27 +//4) The Reciprocity of the Robot: //The Reciprocity score indicates how much people feel a connection with the robot.
28 +
29 +//Mood Score~://
30 +
31 +Our Mood Score is derived from the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire //(Hills et al. ,The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being, (2002))//. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire correlates with personality variables like satisfaction with life, self-esteem and happiness. This score can be used to measure the effect of the interaction with Dogg0 on people's happiness.
32 +
33 +
34 +
19 19  ~1. Kurniawan, S. (2004). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction by Preece, Sharp, and Rogers (2001), ISBN 0471492787.