Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Clemente van der Aa on 2023/04/08 17:42
From version 2.1
edited by Clemente van der Aa
on 2023/03/22 11:41
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
edited by Mohamed Elsayed
on 2023/03/22 12:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.cvanderaa
1 +XWiki.MohamedElsayed
Content
... ... @@ -1,21 +1,26 @@
1 -= 1. Introduction =
1 +**Introduction**
2 2  
3 -<include a short summary of the claims to be tested, i.e., the effects of the functions in a specfic use case>
3 +Section [[Prototype>>url:https://xwiki.ewi.tudelft.nl/xwiki/wiki/rejamexample/view/3.%20Evaluation/a.%20Prototype/]] presented the //socially intelligent// dog-robot Miro-E for the use case " UC02.0: Accompany and entertain the PwD". In this use case the hypothesis is tested that the PwD will feel companionship and lower level of stress due to interactions with the Dogg0. We will test these interactions by assess aspects like Trustworthiness, the effect it has on the mood of the PwD and the functionalities of the Dogg0. These aspects will be measured with a questionnaire that the participants fill in right after the experiment.
4 4  
5 +**Method**
5 5  
6 -= 2. Method =
7 +The prototype was evaluated with an in-person experiment with multiple participants.
7 7  
9 +**Participants**
8 8  
9 -== 2.1 Participants ==
11 +Unfortunately, we can’t do the experiment with real PwD, so the participants will be fellow students that also take the course. The data will be anonymized.
10 10  
13 +**Experimental design**
11 11  
12 -== 2.2 Experimental design ==
15 +For the experiment, we used a within-subject design. All of the participants interacted with both versions of the robot, with half of the participants interacting with version 1 first and then version 2, and the other half in reverse order. This was done to counter-balance the carryover effects.
13 13  
17 +**Tasks**
14 14  
15 -== 2.3 Tasks ==
19 +The participants are instructed to interact with the Dogg0, without prior knowledge of all its functionalities. The goal is thst
16 16  
21 +**Measures**
17 17  
18 -== 2.4 Measures ==
23 +The trustworthiness, the effect it has on the mood of the participant and the functionalities are being measured. This is done by filling in a questionnaire where these aspects are divided in sub questions. The level of agreement and feelings towards these aspects are captured using the Likert Scale.
19 19  
20 20  
21 21  == 2.5 Procedure ==