Skip to Content

Changes for page Mees

Last modified by Mees van der Lecq on 2023/04/11 15:12
From version 3.1
edited by Mees van der Lecq
on 2023/04/05 11:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 5.1
edited by Mees van der Lecq
on 2023/04/11 13:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
1 -== **Week 1** ==
1 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="HWeek1" %)
2 +**Week 1**
2 2  
3 3  In week one we were introduced to some key aspects of socio-cognitive engineering. I am very interested in the area between skepticism of robots and the value of robots regarding elderly. We created a group and we go along well, there are no difficulties in communication.
4 4  
... ... @@ -24,4 +24,8 @@
24 24  
25 25  **Week 6**
26 26  
27 -This week, we thought we were going to be able to do our evaluations and be done in two days. However, the Miro we had did not do exactly what we wanted. It was unable to drive in most situations, which seemed very strange to us. After a lot of attempts and research, we found out it had something to do with its “cliff sensors”. Every dark surface it drove on, was detected as a “cliff” and it would not drive any further. We eventually found a brighter floor surface somewhere in an emergency hallway, which became our testing environment. We were finally able to start our evaluations on Wednesday. In advance, we created an evaluation form with questions about the participant’s emotions such as their mood. The evaluations themselves went ok, but in the small hallway, things got a little tight for the robot. Moreover, the robot still would not properly drive forward, which may have affected the user experience. We were able to do around 10 evaluations. At the end of the week, we started working on the final presentation for the next week
28 +This week, we thought we were going to be able to do our evaluations and be done in two days. However, the Miro we had did not do exactly what we wanted. It was unable to drive in most situations, which seemed very strange to us. After a lot of attempts and research, we found out it had something to do with its “cliff sensors”. Every dark surface it drove on, was detected as a “cliff” and it would not drive any further. We eventually found a brighter floor surface somewhere in an emergency hallway, which became our testing environment.
29 +
30 +**Week 7**
31 +
32 +This week, we were finally able to start our evaluations. In advance, we created an evaluation form with questions about the participant’s emotions such as their mood. The evaluations themselves went ok, but in the small hallway, things got a little tight for the robot. Moreover, the robot still would not properly drive forward, which may have affected the user experience. We were able to do around 10 evaluations. At the end of the week, we started working on the final presentation for the next week