Skip to Content

Changes for page 2. Stakeholders

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 14:46
From version 7.1
edited by Liza Wensink
on 2023/03/28 12:37
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 8.1
edited by Liza Wensink
on 2023/03/28 12:42
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -35,9 +35,8 @@
35 35  
36 36  In connection to specific personas like Bob, the value story could be: As a caregiver, I want Bob to be able to enjoy his exercises when he needs them and not on my schedule, to support him in managing his anger by himself and protecting my own mental health on occasion.
37 37  
38 -Therefore, the values supported by our design for Daphne are mainly performance and efficiency in her daily work life. With the help of the robot, it is possible for Daphne to prioritize tasks differently, without feeling like she is neglecting certain needs of the residents. She is able to trust that the robot will visit and bring outside the residents from time to time and that they are safe with the guidance of the technology, while she focuses on more difficult issues that require human attention. This increases her performance and efficiency and also hopefully brings down stress levels. In terms of specific residents, like Bob, it might be beneficial for Daphne to not always have to be the one who has to take him outside and perhaps take the hit of his difficult emotions. It is important to remember however that the robot will not remove human-assisted walks (since the aim of the technology is never to replace a certain human interaction, but more so aid it). This will therefore not remove the need to spend time with residents in the garden but reduce the amount of times a week that Daphne needs to do so.
38 +Therefore, the values supported by our design for Daphne are mainly performance and efficiency in her daily work life. With the help of the robot, it is possible for Daphne to prioritize tasks differently, without feeling like she is neglecting certain needs of the residents. She is able to trust that the robot will visit and bring outside the residents from time to time and that they are safe with the guidance of the technology, while she focuses on more difficult issues that require human attention. This increases her performance and efficiency and also hopefully brings down stress levels. In terms of specific residents, like Bob, it might be beneficial for Daphne to not always have to be the one who has to take him outside and perhaps take the hit of his difficult emotions. It is important to remember however that the robot will not remove human-assisted walks (since the aim of the technology is never to replace a certain human interaction, but more so aid it). This will therefore not remove the need to spend time with residents in the garden but reduce the number of times a week that Daphne needs to do so.
39 39  
40 -
41 41  ===== Family members of PwD =====
42 42  
43 43  ====== Sarah and Laura (Maria's daughters) [2] ======
... ... @@ -48,8 +48,12 @@
48 48  
49 49  ====== Lisa and Hannah (Maria's granddaughters) [2] ======
50 50  
50 +**Value story: **As a family member, I want to be able to spend time with my grandma, to support my relationship with her.
51 51  
52 +Lisa and Hannah are only 10 and 12 years old, so their values supported by the design might not be as complicated.
52 52  
54 +
55 +
53 53  - ICT-department
54 54  
55 55  Value story: As a person in the ICT department, I want to implement my knowledge, and provide help and tools to support residents/caregivers ability to safely and effectively use new technology.
... ... @@ -61,3 +61,7 @@
61 61  ==== ====
62 62  
63 63  ==== **References** ====
67 +
68 +[1]
69 +
70 +[2]