Changes for page 2. Stakeholders

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
1		-== **Stakeholders for the guidance robot**: ==
	1	+== **Stakeholders for the guidance robot**: ==
2	2
3	3	The value stories will be written on the form: As a <stakeholder> I want <function> to support <value> [1]
4	4
5		-==== **Direct Stakeholders**: ====
	5	+==== **Direct Stakeholders**: ====
6	6
7	7	===== PwD, people with dementia (our two personas): =====
8	8
...	...	@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
23	23	The values our design supports for Bob are quite similar to the ones of Maria, where autonomy and independence play a key role. For Bob, it is also empowering to be able to go outside and move around without having to wait for a caregiver. Since he finds it difficult to motivate himself to leave the house the robot aids him in making these first few steps and decisions, which end up with him managing to go outside and enjoying himself. Therefore it is also possible to conclude that the robot supports the value of health or movement, by motivating residents like Bob to go outside and do some light exercise this way.
24	24
25	25
26		-==== **Indirect Stakeholders**: ====
	26	+==== **Indirect Stakeholders**: ====
27	27
28	28	===== Caretakers at the elderly care facility. =====
29	29
...	...	@@ -35,15 +35,20 @@
35	35
36	36	In connection to specific personas like Bob, the value story could be: As a caregiver, I want Bob to be able to enjoy his exercises when he needs them and not on my schedule, to support him in managing his anger by himself and protecting my own mental health on occasion.
37	37
38		-Therefore, the values supported by our design for Daphne are mainly performance and efficiency in her daily work life. With the help of the robot, it is possible for Daphne to prioritize tasks differently, without feeling like she is neglecting certain needs of the residents. She is able to trust that the robot will visit and bring outside the residents from time to time and that they are safe with the guidance of the technology, while she focuses on more difficult issues that require human attention. This increases her performance and efficiency and also hopefully brings down stress levels. In terms of specific residents, like Bob, it might be beneficial for Daphne to not always have to be the one who has to take him outside and perhaps take the hit of his difficult emotions.
	38	+Therefore, the values supported by our design for Daphne are mainly performance and efficiency in her daily work life. With the help of the robot, it is possible for Daphne to prioritize tasks differently, without feeling like she is neglecting certain needs of the residents. She is able to trust that the robot will visit and bring outside the residents from time to time and that they are safe with the guidance of the technology, while she focuses on more difficult issues that require human attention. This increases her performance and efficiency and also hopefully brings down stress levels. In terms of specific residents, like Bob, it might be beneficial for Daphne to not always have to be the one who has to take him outside and perhaps take the hit of his difficult emotions. It is important to remember however that the robot will not remove human-assisted walks (since the aim of the technology is never to replace a certain human interaction, but more so aid it). This will therefore not remove the need to spend time with residents in the garden but reduce the amount of times a week that Daphne needs to do so.
39	39
40	40
41	41	===== Family members of PwD =====
42	42
43		-General value story: As a family member, I want to give Maria the opportunity to move around more freely and visit the park on her own (also save time on taking her on walks every day), to support the trust that she is in good care and is content.
	43	+====== Sarah and Laura (Maria's daughters) [2] ======
44	44
45		-Laura and Lara: Wants to spend more time with her children in the weekend and wants to give Maria the opportunity to go on walks by herself, trusting that it happens safely and satisfies Maria's needs.
	45	+**Value story**: As a family member, I want to give Maria the opportunity to move around more independently and visit the care center garden on her own, to support the trust that Maria is in good care and is content.
46	46
	47	+Maria's daughters, Sarah and Laura, both have children that require more of their attention and time. Laura has recently had her first child and her newborn son is therefore taking up a lot of her attention. She is also tired from long days of caring for the baby and does not always have the energy or time to take her mother outside. Sarah has two children and is a single mother, which also takes a lot of her time. The technology supports Sarah and Laura being able to have more time to care for their children while being sure that Maria is in good care and is safely able to enjoy her time in the garden. This is again not going to remove Sarah and Laura from taking Maria on a walk entirely, but also supports freeing up a bit of time that can be put on other things. This way Sarah and Laura can instead focus on spending quality time with their mother, instead of feeling stressed about satisfying certain needs of hers.
	48	+
	49	+====== Lisa and Hannah (Maria's granddaughters) [ ======
	50	+
	51	+
47	47	- ICT-department
48	48
49	49	Value story: As a person in the ICT department, I want to implement my knowledge, and provide help and tools to support residents/caregivers ability to safely and effectively use new technology.