Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 14:53

From version 5.1
edited by Liza Wensink
on 2023/04/03 20:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
edited by Liza Wensink
on 2023/03/01 12:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2 2  
3 3  Important takeaways:
4 4  
5 -- Many relevant things about evaluation methods in human-robot interaction studies were described. Not only were different examples of studies highlighted but also how these were evaluated. The key takeaways here are that: "It is essential to use three or more methods of evaluation to establish study validity. Additionally, it is important to determine the appropriate sample size necessary to obtain statistically significant results." Evaluation methods are also very important for us to consider as we go forward with our design.
5 +- Many relevant things about evaluation methods in human-robot interaction studies were described. Not only were different examples of studies highlighted, but also how these were evaluated. The key takeaways here are that: "It is essential to use three or more methods of evaluation to establish study validity. Additionally, it is important to determine the appropriate sample size necessary to obtain statistically significant results." Evaluation methods are also very important for us to consider as we go forward with our design.
6 6  
7 7  - In order to conduct a successful HRI study the planning and design stages are also really important. It is essential to determine what type of study will be conducted and what kind of study it will be. For our own study, either within-subjects design or between-subjects design is probably preferred. Which one it will be is not quite settled, since we are still considering the time, learning effect and potential frustrations from similar interactions with the robot. The between-subjects design might be cleaner in this regard, but the results could potentially be affected by the differences among the participants to a larger extent.
8 8