Changes for page 3. Human-Robot Collaboration
Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 14:53
From version 10.1
edited by Demi Breen
on 2023/04/09 14:53
on 2023/04/09 14:53
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 7.1
edited by Liza Wensink
on 2023/04/04 11:52
on 2023/04/04 11:52
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. Demibreen10001 +XWiki.lwensink - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,21 +1,28 @@ 1 - When it comes to human-robot collaboration andteraction, social factorsgoverninghuman-human interactionapply equally [1]. This means that often human-human interaction models need to be considered and simulated to make the interactionsfeel natural and well-received. Thismeans aspects such as gaze, tone, eye contact, andexpressions need to be incorporated and thesecomprise essentialparts of human-robotcollaboration.Bothcommunication channelsand cues are also important [1]. This means that not only are therobot's own communicative abilities importantwhenit comes to human-robotcollaboration, but alsotherobot's ability to interpret and take in cues and communicationgiven or displayed by the human counterpart in any way.1 +Regarding conducting studies in Human-Robot Collaboration, we have gathered the following information: 2 2 3 - Thisis centraltoourprojectalso. Usually,thesecommunicationsare aidedifthe robotlooksmore humanoid,which for elderlycare andfor PwDsisverylikelytobea centralspect, to makeurethat interactingwiththe robot feels natural and does notstrayaway fromregular human-humaninteraction.Wehavetakenhisintoaccountprimarily becausetheolderpopulation tends tobeless familiarandcomfortable with technologyon averageandmakeit a more naturalexperience thatdoes not necessarilyrequirethePwDtoactnanyparticularway that mightnotfeelcomfortableto them.3 +Firstly, focusing on the paper //Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction, //many conclusions could be drawn when it comes to relevant evaluation methods in human-robot interaction studies. The relevant takeaways for our study regarded that it is essential to use three or more methods of evaluation to establish a study's validity and that additionally, it is also important to determine the appropriate sample size necessary to obtain significant results. [1] At this stage in our research, evaluation methods are really important to consider and this definitely aids us going forward. 4 4 5 - It iscrucialto considerhow exactly thesequeswill thetakeninbytherobot and what kind of sensors andcameraswillberesponsiblefor this.Thisisalso somethingwe needtoconsider in ourdesign,especiallywiththePepperrobotwhichalso potentiallyhasthetabletoption ofcommunication.5 +Further, in order to conduct a successful HRI study the planning and design stages are really important. Here, we tried to consider what type of evaluation and what kind of study would fit our objective the best and we have considered either within-subjects design or between-subject design. We are still considering the time, the learning effect, and potential frustrations that might come if participants have too many similar interactions with the robot. The between-subjects design might be preferable in this regard, but the results could potentially be affected by the difference among the participants to a larger extent [1]. 6 6 7 - =====Regardingconductingstudies inHuman-RobotCollaboration, wehave consideredthe following:=====7 +Another important aspect highlighted in this study is location and environment. It is mentioned that it is crucial that the study reflects the environment where the application is meant to be used and that conditions should be simulated accordingly and that this also ties into the choice of robot for the study [1]. In our case, it is important that we try to simulate the movement and walking of the robot together with the person. This means we need to consider a space that allows for some movement of the robot and participant together. Our goal is to simulate a walk in the garden and it is therefore important that we can mimic these conditions of a walk as closely as we can. 8 8 9 -F irstly,focusing onthe paper//ConductingStudiesinHuman-RobotInteraction, //manyconclusions couldbedrawnwhen itcomestorelevant evaluationmethodsin human-robotinteractionstudies.Therelevanttakeawaysrom ourstudy regardedthatit is essential tousethreeormoremethodsofevaluation toestablishastudy'svalidityand thatadditionally, it is alsoimportant to determinetheappropriate sample sizenecessaryto obtain significantresults.[2] Atthis stage in ourresearch,evaluation methodsare reallyimportant toconsider and thisdefinitelyaids usgoingforward.9 +Furthermore, the exemplar study provided [1] was very useful to see a complete structure of a study, performed according to the guidelines. Conducting proper and successful studies is really important for the general field of HRI, since it is rather new, and these studies are always an important step in further normalizing and accepting robots as a part of society and as a helpful component in our lives [1], which is important to remember and hopefully something we can make a small contribution to through completing this course. 10 10 11 -Further, in order to conduct a successful HRI study the planning and design stages are really important. Here, we tried to consider what type of evaluation and what kind of study would fit our objective the best and we have considered either within-subjects design or between-subject design. We are still considering the time, the learning effect, and potential frustrations that might come if participants have too many similar interactions with the robot. The between-subjects design might be preferable in this regard, but the results could potentially be affected by the difference among the participants to a larger extent [2]. 11 +Paper: **Human-Robot Collaboration: A Literature Review and Augmented Reality Approach in Design.** 12 +[[https:~~/~~/journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5772/5664>>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5772/5664]] 12 12 13 - Anotherimportant aspecthighlighted in thisstudy islocationandenvironment. It is mentioned that it is crucial that the study reflects the environment wherethe application ismeant to be used and that conditions should be simulated accordingly and that this also ties into thechoiceof robot for the study [2]. Inour case, itis important that wetry to simulate the movementand walking of theobot together with the person. This means we needtoconsidera spacethat allows for somemovementf the robot andparticipant together.Our goal is to simulate a walk in the garden and it is therefore important that we can mimic these conditions of a walk as closely as we can.14 +This is just a free search on the internet on the topic. 14 14 15 - Furthermore, the exemplar study provided [2] was very useful to see a complete structure of a study, performed according to the guidelines. Conducting proper and successful studies is really important for the general field of HRI, since it is rather new, and these studies are always an importantstep in further normalizing and accepting robotsas a part of society and as a helpful component in our lives [2],which is important to remember and hopefullyomethingwe can make a small contribution to through completing this course.16 +Important takeaways: 16 16 18 +- "...social factors governing human-human interaction equally apply to human-computer interaction". This means that often human-human models of interaction need to be considered, which could potentially feel like a very natural part of the process. This means that aspect such as gaze, tone, eye contact etc. are very often essential parts of human-robot collaboration. Both communication cues and channels are therefore important. 19 + 20 +- Not only are the robots own communicative abilities important when it comes to human-robot collaboration, but also the robot's ability to interpret and take in the cues and communication given/displayed by the human. This is central for our project also. This is usually aided by robots looking more humanoid, which for elderly care or for PwD's is very likely to be very important, to make sure that interacting with the robot feels natural and does not stray too far away from looking at or interacting with a human. 21 + 22 +- It is important to consider how exactly these cues and things will be taken in by the robot, what kind of sensors cameras etc will be responsible for it. This is also something we need to consider in our design, especially with the pepper robot who also has a tablet on the chest. 23 + 17 17 === References === 18 18 19 -[1] Green, A. Scott., Billinghurst, Mark., Chen, XiaoQi., Chase, Geoffrey, J., (2008), Human-Robot Collaboration: A Literature Review and Augmented Reality Approach in Design, //International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1//. Online [[https:~~/~~/journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5772/5664>>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5772/5664]]26 +[1] 20 20 21 -[2] Bethel, L. Cindy., Henkel, Zachary., Baugus, Kenna., (2020), Conducting Studies in Human-Robot Interaction, //Human-Robot Interaction, Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems, //Online, [[https:~~/~~/link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4>>https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_4]]28 +[2]