Skip to Content

Changes for page 1. Music and Cognition

Last modified by Hugo van Dijk on 2023/04/10 15:01
From version 4.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/23 16:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/23 15:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,5 +3,3 @@
1 -Paper 2:
2 -
3 3  * . Additionally, Chang et al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.
4 4  * Paro was evaluated more positively, whereas the Guide robot could be improved in terms of making it more simple and improving its ergonomics
5 5  * Hebesberger et al. [16] investigated the use of a robot as a walking group as-
... ... @@ -25,13 +25,3 @@
25 25  * Positive effect on cognitive activity.
26 26  * Robot itself not perse positive effect on social interaction, but music does.
27 27  * Over course of sessions, ppl interacted less with robot and more with each other. If not like robot from start ~-~-> stopped with study. Other ppl displayed continuously high interest levels.
28 -
29 -
30 -Paper 1:
31 -
32 -People find it hard to interact with the tablet. Made design easier later on by having pictures. Process was about simplifying the interaction for the PwD. Reaction to music was very different between the PwD. Too loud is intimidating.Difficult interface makes it hard to connect with other PwD. Different types of music interesting for mother/daughter.
33 -
34 -
35 -So:
36 -
37 -We thought about including music in our system but because of our environment (outside), it might be distracting/annoying for other people in the area if music is played.  It could also be distracting for Maria/Bob if the task of walking/finding the route is difficult enough. In this context it is not too relevant to use music for reminiscence.