Skip to Content

Changes for page 1. Music and Cognition

Last modified by Hugo van Dijk on 2023/04/10 15:01
From version 3.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/23 15:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Ruud de Jong
on 2023/02/13 12:51
Change comment: Imported from XAR

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.hjpvandijk
1 +xwiki:XWiki.RuuddeJong
Content
... ... @@ -1,25 +1,0 @@
1 -* . Additionally, Chang et al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.
2 -* Paro was evaluated more positively, whereas the Guide robot could be improved in terms of making it more simple and improving its ergonomics
3 -* Hebesberger et al. [16] investigated the use of a robot as a walking group as-
4 -sistant at a care site accompanying adults with advanced dementia. The robot
5 -offered visual and acoustic stimulation. The findings suggested that a robot has
6 -the potential to enhance motivation, group coherence, and also mood within the
7 -walking group
8 -* For exercise and reminiscence
9 -* Music bingo
10 -* Robot becomes point of discussion & conversation
11 -* Used NAO robot
12 -* One participant being negative towards the robot can influence the rest.
13 -* Caretaker stresses that caretaker interference is needed for PwD to keep interacting with robot.
14 -* Ppl had trouble following movemenents sometimes.
15 -* Remenicense exercise made PwD active.
16 -* One participant scared of robot when it talked after being quiet for some time.
17 -* Caretaker states robot's main purpose should be conversational interaction, not exercise.
18 -* Robot should have less monotonic voice.
19 -* Ppl remembered robot but not the music/singing/dancing.
20 -* Ppl respond more to music than engage in talking
21 -* Not clear if positive effect on people's state.
22 -* Potentially, inviting to dance better effect than structured exercise.
23 -* Positive effect on cognitive activity.
24 -* Robot itself not perse positive effect on social interaction, but music does.
25 -* Over course of sessions, ppl interacted less with robot and more with each other. If not like robot from start ~-~-> stopped with study. Other ppl displayed continuously high interest levels.