Skip to Content

Changes for page 1. Music and Cognition

Last modified by Hugo van Dijk on 2023/04/10 15:01
From version 1.1
edited by Ruud de Jong
on 2023/02/13 12:51
Change comment: Imported from XAR
To version 3.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/02/23 15:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.RuuddeJong
1 +XWiki.hjpvandijk
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,25 @@
1 +* . Additionally, Chang et al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.
2 +* Paro was evaluated more positively, whereas the Guide robot could be improved in terms of making it more simple and improving its ergonomics
3 +* Hebesberger et al. [16] investigated the use of a robot as a walking group as-
4 +sistant at a care site accompanying adults with advanced dementia. The robot
5 +offered visual and acoustic stimulation. The findings suggested that a robot has
6 +the potential to enhance motivation, group coherence, and also mood within the
7 +walking group
8 +* For exercise and reminiscence
9 +* Music bingo
10 +* Robot becomes point of discussion & conversation
11 +* Used NAO robot
12 +* One participant being negative towards the robot can influence the rest.
13 +* Caretaker stresses that caretaker interference is needed for PwD to keep interacting with robot.
14 +* Ppl had trouble following movemenents sometimes.
15 +* Remenicense exercise made PwD active.
16 +* One participant scared of robot when it talked after being quiet for some time.
17 +* Caretaker states robot's main purpose should be conversational interaction, not exercise.
18 +* Robot should have less monotonic voice.
19 +* Ppl remembered robot but not the music/singing/dancing.
20 +* Ppl respond more to music than engage in talking
21 +* Not clear if positive effect on people's state.
22 +* Potentially, inviting to dance better effect than structured exercise.
23 +* Positive effect on cognitive activity.
24 +* Robot itself not perse positive effect on social interaction, but music does.
25 +* Over course of sessions, ppl interacted less with robot and more with each other. If not like robot from start ~-~-> stopped with study. Other ppl displayed continuously high interest levels.