Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10
From version 8.3
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2023/03/23 14:46
Change comment: Edited comment
To version 12.1
edited by Maya Elasmar
on 2023/03/25 12:04
Change comment: Uploaded new attachment "Questionnaire (2).pdf", version 1.1

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
1 +XWiki.MayaElasmar
Content
... ... @@ -20,38 +20,48 @@
20 20  
21 21  == 2.2 Experimental design ==
22 22  
23 -The Pepper robot will be turned on and in a "normal" situation would walk around to monitor the state and activity of the PwD in the care facility. However, because of the lack of time and since we are now only working with students Pepper will search for a face and will then start interacting with the student. The interaction will take place in a TUDelft facility. The location is thus bounded and safe. The robot will not have to monitor the surroundings. The students will then perform the experiment  with the robot after which a questionnaire will be filled in,.
23 +The Pepper robot will be turned on and in a "normal" situation would walk around to monitor the state and activity of the PwD in the care facility. However, because of the lack of time and since we are now only working with students Pepper will search for a face and will then start interacting with the student. The interaction will take place in a TUDelft facility. The experiment will be hold in a room with the robot. Unfortunately, the space of the room is small compared to a an actual park. The robot needs some space to move, hence we will make sure to move everything moved out of the way and that other students(who are not experiment at the moment) wait in the room next. The room also has a different surface than an actual park. However, our experiment focused more on the motivation to go outside then the walk itself. Due to the fact that we want to compare emotion-based and goal-based motivations, ,multiple experiments will be taken. One in which we only test emotion-based motivation and another in which we only test goal-based motivation. Both are measured by a questionnaire, whether there the students indeed agree to go on a walk and how long it takes until the robot convinces a student to go on walk. We plan to do the experiment on a fellow team, which can exist of 4 or 5 people. We want to divide them, half will do the experiment regarding emotion-based and the other half the goal-based one.
24 24  
25 25  == 2.3 Tasks ==
26 26  
27 -The robot and students need to perform the following tasks:
27 +The student is expected to communicate with the robot by doing the following:
28 28  
29 -~1. Pepper will be turned on and will scan/check his environment
29 +~1. The student looks the robot in the eye.
30 30  
31 -2. Pepper will look for a face and will turn to the person that he sees
31 +2. The student communicates with the robot through a small conversation in the beginning.
32 32  
33 -3. Pepper will recognize a face and will introduce itself to the student
33 +3. When the student agrees to go on a walk, he/she is expected to walk 1 or 2 meters with it (small distance due to the room size).
34 34  
35 -4. Pepper will then ask to go for a walk after which the student can either say yes or no
35 +4. The student will make a small talk with the robot as well.
36 36  
37 -5. Pepper will start motivating based on the answer that the student gives:
37 +5. When the walk finishes (after the walk), the student communicates with the robot again.
38 38  
39 -* 5.1 When the student says yes, Pepper will start walking with the student and during the walk will have some small talk
40 -* 5.2 When the student says no, Pepper will start the motivational part of the experiment. For the first experiment Pepper will use emotion-based motivation and for the second experiment Pepper will use the goal-based motivation
41 -* 5.3 If the student then decides to say yes, then Pepper will start walking with the student and during the walk will have some small talk
39 +6. Finally, the student fills in the questionnaire provided by us
42 42  
43 -6. After the walk/activity is finished Pepper will thank the student and will state again how important it is to stay active
44 44  
45 -7. Then the student is asked to answer some questions to evaluate the experience.
46 -
47 47  == 2.4 Measures ==
48 48  
49 49  If our situation, we would like to measure whether the provided motivation indeed has effect on the person. We would like to compare which one has more effect as well. That could be measured by seeing whether they indeed go on the walk or not. We would also like to measure how long it takes to convince them to go on a walk when they do not want. We would also like to measure their emotions during and after the walk. Did they enjoy it? Were they bored? Did they feel lonely? That could be measured with the feedback asked after the walk.
50 50  
46 +In an optimal scenario where we can test the robot on PwD. We would have measured the amount of times a person went out. We would also have measured the effect of the goal and emotion based motivation on the long-term over the people. Whether it will be less effective over the time or not. We would also measure the emotional effect on the caregivers and the functional effect. By the functional effect, we mean whether they indeed have more time to do other tasks or not. It would also have been perfect if we could measure the effect of the walks on the PwD and their health.
47 +
51 51  The questionnaire for the feedback is in the attachment.
52 52  
53 -In an optimal scenario where we can test the robot on PwD. We would have measured the amount of times a person went out. We would also have measured the effect of the goal and emotion based motivation on the long-term over the people. Whether it will be less effective over the time or not. We would also measure the emotional effect on the caregivers and the functional effect. By the functional effect, we mean whether they indeed have more time to do other tasks or not. It would also have been perfect if we could measure the effect of the walks on the PwD and their health.
50 +The questionnaire measures the experiment of the interaction of the students with the robot. By that we mean it measures:
54 54  
52 + - the usability of the robot
53 +
54 + - the enjoyment of communicating with the robot
55 +
56 + - the usefulness of the robot
57 +
58 + - the humanization of the robot, how much does the robot feel as real person
59 +
60 + - the trustiness of the robot
61 +
62 + -  the convenience of the reasons provided by the robots.
63 +
64 +
55 55  == 2.5 Procedure ==
56 56  
57 57  The procedure will be as followed: the robot will see a fellow student. Ask him/her to go on a walk given a reason to motivate him/her. If the student accepts, then they on a walk. If the student says no, then the robot will provide more motivational reasons to go on a walk. Of course, the robot should not be annoying and insist too much. Hence, after providing two or more reasons if the student still says no, then they do not go on a walk. If the student changes his/her mind and accepts to go on a walk, then we are in the next phase of the test. During the walk, the robot will have a small social talk with the student. If the student decides to go back earlier, then the robot will try to convince him/her to keep going. After the walk, the robot will ask how to the walk went and that he have enjoyed it. The student will also answer some questions regarding the whole experience.
Questionnaire (2).pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.MayaElasmar
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +36.2 KB
Content