Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10
From version 60.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/04/08 17:20
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 63.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/04/08 17:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -45,11 +45,11 @@
45 45  The participant is expected to experiment according to the following plan:
46 46  
47 47  * Step 1: The participant needs to fill in the consent form
48 -* Step 2: The participant needs to read the context information en emphasise as Bob
48 +* Step 2: The participant needs to read the context information and step into the shoes of Bob
49 49  * Step 3:The participant needs to stand close enough to the robot to have an interaction/conversation with Pepper
50 50  * Step 4: The participant needs to look the robot in the eye
51 51  * Step 5: The participant needs to actively answer the questions provided by Pepper during the experiment
52 -* Step 6: When the participant has been motivated to go on a walk he/she needs to walk for 1 to 2 meters with the robot
52 +* Step 6: When the participant has been motivated to go on a walk he/she needs to walk for 4 meters with the robot
53 53  * Step 7: During the walk, the participant is expected to contribute in some small talk with Pepper
54 54  * Step 8: When the walk is finished the participant needs to communicate with Pepper after which Pepper will say goodbye and the actual experiment is over
55 55  * Step 9: After the experiment, the participant needs to fill in the questionnaire provided by Group 4
... ... @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
60 60  
61 61  In an optimal scenario where we can test the robot on PwD. We would have measured the number of times a person went out. We would also have measured the effect of the goal and emotion-based motivation on the long-term over the people. Whether it will be less effective over time or not. We would also measure the emotional effect on the caregivers and the functional effect. By the functional effect, we mean whether they indeed have more time to do other tasks or not. It would also have been perfect if we could measure the effect of the walks on the PwD and their health.
62 62  
63 -The questionnaire for the feedback is in the attachment (Questionnaire (2)). The questionnaire is based on a questionnaire in the paper " Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit " [2]. There are also 5 questions at the end that we added ourselves because we think it fits our experiment.
63 +The questionnaire for the feedback is in the attachment [[Questionnaire (2).pdf>>attach:Questionnaire (2).pdf]]. The questionnaire is based on a questionnaire in the paper " Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit " [2]. There are also 5 questions at the end that we added ourselves because we think it fits our experiment.
64 64  
65 65  The questionnaire measures the experiment of the interaction of the students with the robot. By that we mean it measures:
66 66  
... ... @@ -87,9 +87,9 @@
87 87  
88 88  ~1. Pepper will be turned on and will scan/check his environment
89 89  
90 -2. Pepper will look for a face and will turn to the person that he sees
90 +2. Pepper wil look straight up, as if it is looking at the participant's face.
91 91  
92 -3. Pepper will recognize a face and will introduce itself to the student
92 +3. Pepper will say hi to the participant.
93 93  
94 94  4. Pepper will then ask to go for a walk after which the student can either say yes or no
95 95