Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.Demibreen1000
	1	+XWiki.lwensink

Content

...	...	@@ -79,17 +79,12 @@
79	79
80	80	== 2.5 Procedure ==
81	81
82		-The claims that need to be tested are thus:
	82	+The procedure is as follows: we want the to test the claims mentioned above in the introduction. Therefore we programmed two routes in Choreography: one for the emotion-based motivation test and one for the goal-based motivation. To focus on only these two types of motivations, everything else in the route was kept the same. This is also to make sure that nothing else besides the motivation influences the participant's opinion on taking the walk.
83	83
84		-- The effect of emotion-based motivation; The PwD can comprehend the emotion that is being conveyed and in that way is motivated to contribute to the activity of walking in the garden.
	84	+For the exeperiment we wrote an [[orientation script>>doc:3\. Evaluation.Scenario description.WebHome]] for the participants to introduce them to our design and explain them what they should do and that they should step into the shoes of our persona Bob. Bob is a person with anger issues and dementia. However, the participants did not know whether they are tested with emotion-based or goal-based motivation walk. We also wrote a consent form to ask for their consent to take part in the experiment. One of the main points in the consent from is that they will be recorded. We wanted to record them to re-evaluate all the experiments and see if we missed something. This also helped us with the final results and the discussion. If the participant did not agree, then we of course did not record him/her.
85	85
86		-- The effect of goal-based motivation; The PwD can comprehend the goal and end-state of the promoted activity and in that way is motivated to contribute to the activity of walking in the garden
	86	+The following happend during an experiment:
87	87
88		-- Whether there is a noticeable difference between emotion-based and goal-based; The PwD can communicate how he/she feels and score the walk.
89		-
90		-
91		-The robot and students need to perform the following tasks:
92		-
93	93	~1. Pepper will be turned on and will scan/check his environment
94	94
95	95	2. Pepper will look for a face and will turn to the person that he sees
...	...	@@ -100,13 +100,13 @@
100	100
101	101	5. Pepper will start motivating based on the answer that the student gives:
102	102
103		- 5.1 When the student says yes, Pepper will start walking with the student and during the walk will have some small talk
104		-5.2 When the student says no, Pepper will start the motivational part of the experiment. For the first experiment Pepper will use emotion-based motivation and for the second experiment Pepper will use the goal-based motivation
105		-5.3 If the student then decides to say yes, then Pepper will start walking with the student and during the walk will have some small talk
106		-6. After the walk/activity is finished Pepper will thank the student and will state again how important it is to stay active
	98	+ 5a. When the student says yes, Pepper will start walking with the student and during the walk will have some small talk
	99	+ 5b. When the student says no, Pepper will start the motivational part of the experiment. For the first experiment Pepper will use emotion-based  motivation and for the second experiment Pepper will use the goal-based motivation
	100	+ 5c. If the student then decides to say yes, then Pepper will start walking with the student and during the walk will have some small talk
107	107
108		-7. Then the student is asked to answer some questions to evaluate the experience.
	102	+During the experiment, one of us wrote down observations of the experiment and another one recoreded the experiment if allowed. We had also prepared a questionnaire to measure our claims, which we talked about in details in the measures section. All the participants had to fill in these questionnaire after the experiment. We wanted to make sure that we had an equal amount of both types of tests to get an unbiased result. Hence, we finished the evaluation once we had a relatively good and equal amount of experiments.
109	109
	104	+
110	110	== 2.6 Material ==
111	111
112	112	The material needed for this experiment is of course the Pepper robot. We also need a laptop to run the robot.
...	...	@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@
140	140
141	141	As the robot's speech recognition could only understand single words due to its implementation, this resulted in numerous occasions where a participant was not understood and had to repeat themselves. It also occurred that the robot understood 'yes' when 'no' was said.
142	142
143		-- Mention something about only one participant going into Bob's character fully? And that he mentioned that the "no" he was giving was more attention-seeking than a real no.
	138	+In total during all of the evaluations performed, only one participant went into the Bob persona fully, which was described for the participant in the orientation script. He mentioned that the "no" he was giving during the test was more attention-seeking than a real no to the walk, which is a very useful observation.
144	144
145		-- Add that sometimes the robot cut participants off, if they were speaking slower or elaborating on their answers.
	140	+In a couple of the evaluations, it happened that the robot cut participants off mid-sentence once it had recognized a word that was spoken if they were speaking slower or elaborating on their answers. This is not ideal for a future and complete design and definitely would be something that needs to be worked on.
146	146
147	147
148	148