Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10
From version 5.1
edited by Maya Elasmar
on 2023/03/19 15:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 8.3
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2023/03/23 14:46
Change comment: Edited comment

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.MayaElasmar
1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
Content
... ... @@ -48,10 +48,13 @@
48 48  
49 49  If our situation, we would like to measure whether the provided motivation indeed has effect on the person. We would like to compare which one has more effect as well. That could be measured by seeing whether they indeed go on the walk or not. We would also like to measure how long it takes to convince them to go on a walk when they do not want. We would also like to measure their emotions during and after the walk. Did they enjoy it? Were they bored? Did they feel lonely? That could be measured with the feedback asked after the walk.
50 50  
51 +The questionnaire for the feedback is in the attachment.
52 +
51 51  In an optimal scenario where we can test the robot on PwD. We would have measured the amount of times a person went out. We would also have measured the effect of the goal and emotion based motivation on the long-term over the people. Whether it will be less effective over the time or not. We would also measure the emotional effect on the caregivers and the functional effect. By the functional effect, we mean whether they indeed have more time to do other tasks or not. It would also have been perfect if we could measure the effect of the walks on the PwD and their health.
52 52  
53 53  == 2.5 Procedure ==
54 54  
57 +The procedure will be as followed: the robot will see a fellow student. Ask him/her to go on a walk given a reason to motivate him/her. If the student accepts, then they on a walk. If the student says no, then the robot will provide more motivational reasons to go on a walk. Of course, the robot should not be annoying and insist too much. Hence, after providing two or more reasons if the student still says no, then they do not go on a walk. If the student changes his/her mind and accepts to go on a walk, then we are in the next phase of the test. During the walk, the robot will have a small social talk with the student. If the student decides to go back earlier, then the robot will try to convince him/her to keep going. After the walk, the robot will ask how to the walk went and that he have enjoyed it. The student will also answer some questions regarding the whole experience.
55 55  
56 56  == 2.6 Material ==
57 57  
Questionnaire.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.MayaElasmar
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +26.1 KB
Content
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.MarkNeerincx
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,9 @@
1 +How many participants do you plan to include?
2 +
3 +Experimental design is a very short description of, the methodological set-up of the experiment e.g., within or between subjects design, number and level independent variables, whether there are repeated measurements, are the conditions counter-balanced....
4 +
5 +In "tasks", you are expected to describe the task of the participants: what do they have to do?)
6 +
7 +Measures should explicitly operationalize the effects of the research questions/hypotheses. E.g. what is the questionnaire measuring?
8 +
9 +Procedure: some information from other part could be moved to the procedure (e.g. Pepper will be turned on, ...). Also include the introduction, instruction in the procedure. You can make an ordered list of the procedure steps, to make it easy to process.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2023-03-23 14:41:55.132