Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10
From version 44.1
edited by Liza Wensink
on 2023/04/04 17:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 46.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/04/06 17:53
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.lwensink
1 +XWiki.hjpvandijk
Content
... ... @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@
172 172  - In future studies the amount of participants should be considered, as well as testing the design on PwD and in a garden. Further improvements to the speech recognition are needed, as well as the smoothness of the walking and the distances travelled and the aspect of the participant's distance to the robot. Perhaps if the less realistic aspects discussed above are minimized, a robot that feels more realistic would result in participants listening to the actual prompts given, rather than going into the experiment with a predisposed idea of what they are going to do or answer and would also perhaps deter the participants from tending to reply positively.
173 173  
174 174  
175 +**ADD FUTURE WORK**
176 +
177 +
175 175  = 5. Conclusions =
176 176  
177 177  Both systems were deemed enjoyable and fascinating, and little rejections were made to both types of persuasions. No significant difference was found in any of the measures between the two groups.