Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10

From version 36.1
edited by Maya Elasmar
on 2023/04/01 12:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 35.1
edited by Maya Elasmar
on 2023/04/01 12:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
165 165  
166 166  - Normally, a robot should really take a walk outside. It should have been tested how a robot will do in actual garden, totally another surface then the room we did the experiment. Unfortunately, we could not do that, because we are not allowed to move th robot from the room.
167 167  
168 -- In future studies the amount of participants should be considered, as well as testing the design on PwD and in a garden. Further improvements to the speech recognition are needed, as well as the smoothness of the walking and the distances travelled and the aspect of the participant's distance to the robot. Perhaps if the less realistic aspects discussed above are minimized, a robot that feels more realistic would result in participants listening to the actual prompts given, rather than going into the experiment with a predisposed idea of what they are going to do or answer and would also perhaps deter the participants from tending to reply positively.
168 +- In future studies the amount of participants should be considered, as well as testing the design on PwD. Further improvements to the speech recognition are needed, as well as the smoothness of the walking and the distances travelled and the aspect of the participant's distance to the robot. Perhaps if the less realistic aspects discussed above are minimized, a robot that feels more realistic would result in participants listening to the actual prompts given, rather than going into the experiment with a predisposed idea of what they are going to do or answer and would also perhaps deter the participants from tending to reply positively.
169 169  
170 170  
171 171  = 5. Conclusions =