Changes for page b. Test
Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10
From version 35.1
edited by Maya Elasmar
on 2023/04/01 12:26
on 2023/04/01 12:26
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 34.1
edited by Liza Wensink
on 2023/04/01 10:46
on 2023/04/01 10:46
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. MayaElasmar1 +XWiki.lwensink - Content
-
... ... @@ -163,8 +163,6 @@ 163 163 164 164 - Interesting to consider is if participants are perhaps inclined to be positive, or feel like they need to be in such a project evaluation and if ideas like these also ended up affecting the outcome. ? 165 165 166 -- Normally, a robot should really take a walk outside. It should have been tested how a robot will do in actual garden, totally another surface then the room we did the experiment. Unfortunately, we could not do that, because we are not allowed to move th robot from the room. 167 - 168 168 - In future studies the amount of participants should be considered, as well as testing the design on PwD. Further improvements to the speech recognition are needed, as well as the smoothness of the walking and the distances travelled and the aspect of the participant's distance to the robot. Perhaps if the less realistic aspects discussed above are minimized, a robot that feels more realistic would result in participants listening to the actual prompts given, rather than going into the experiment with a predisposed idea of what they are going to do or answer and would also perhaps deter the participants from tending to reply positively. 169 169 170 170