Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10
From version 30.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/03/30 20:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 32.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/03/30 22:11
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -110,9 +110,10 @@
110 110  
111 111  = 3. Results =
112 112  
113 +On average, participants only rejected the robot's persuasion attempts 0.5 times. The participants rated the robot a 2/5 in terms of being scary. They gave a 4/5 for it making life more interesting and it being good to make use of the robot. Questions related to the participant's enjoyment and fascination with the system and the robot were met with ratings between 3.8 and 4.1. The question "I think the staff would like me using the robot" was rated a 4/5 on average.
114 +
113 113  Firstly, the Jarque-Bera test [2] was used to check for normality. When the answers for a question weren't normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U-Test [3] was used. For normally distributed answers, the T-Test [4] was used. These tests used the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the two groups. When the calculated probability value (p-value) is less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the two groups for the answers to that question.
114 114  
115 -
116 116  Even though the average rejections were higher for emotion-based (0,875) than for goal-based(0,125). This difference was not significant.
117 117  
118 118  Furthermore, there was no significant difference in any of the questionnaire answers between the two groups.
... ... @@ -138,7 +138,9 @@
138 138  
139 139  = 5. Conclusions =
140 140  
142 +Both systems were deemed enjoyable and fascinating, and little rejections were made to both types of persuasions. No significant difference was found in any of the measures between the two groups.
141 141  
144 +
142 142  == References ==
143 143  
144 144  [1] Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. //Journal of Cognition//, //2//(1), 16. DOI: [[http:~~/~~/doi.org/10.5334/joc.72>>url:http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72]]