Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -110,16 +110,55 @@
110	110
111	111	= 3. Results =
112	112
113		-Firstly, the Jarque-Bera test [2] was used to check for normality. When the answers for a question weren't normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U-Test [3] was used. For normally distributed answers, the T-Test [4] was used. These tests used the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the two groups. When the calculated probability value (p-value) is less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the two groups for the answers to that question.
	113	+There was no significant difference between the observations and questionnaire answers between the two groups.
114	114
	115	+|**Question / Behaviour**|**P-value**
	116	+|Amount of times said no to persuasion|0,17
	117	+|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to make mistakes with it|0,09
	118	+|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to break something|0,44
	119	+|I find the robot scary|0,50
	120	+|I find the robot intimidating|0,57
	121	+|I think it’s a good idea to use the robot|0,23
	122	+|the robot would make my life more interesting|0,60
	123	+|It’s good to make use of the robot|1,00
	124	+|I have everything I need to make good use of the robot|0,56
	125	+|I know enough of the robot to make good use of it|0,60
	126	+|I think I’ll use the robot during the next few days|0,30
	127	+|I am certain to use the robot during the next few days|0,68
	128	+|I’m planning to use the robot during the next few days|0,20
	129	+|I think the robot can be adaptive to what I need|0,28
	130	+|I think the robot will only do what I need at that particular moment|0,76
	131	+|I think the robot will help me when I consider it to be necessary|0,76
	132	+|I enjoy the robot talking to me|0,52
	133	+|I enjoy doing things with the robot|0,22
	134	+|I find the robot enjoyable|0,34
	135	+|I find the robot fascinating|0,17
	136	+|I find the robot boring|0,28
	137	+|I think I will know quickly how to use the robot|0,48
	138	+|I find the robot easy to use|0,57
	139	+|I think I can use the robot without any help|0,77
	140	+|I think I can use the robot when there is someone around to help me|0,83
	141	+|I think I can use the robot when I have a good manual|0,37
	142	+|I consider the robot a pleasant conversational partner|0,63
	143	+|I find the robot pleasant to interact with|0,56
	144	+|I feel the robot understands me|0,73
	145	+|I think the robot is nice|0,76
	146	+|I think the robot is useful to me|0,28
	147	+|It would be convenient for me to have the robot|0,56
	148	+|I think the robot can help me with many things|0,60
	149	+|I think the staff would like me using the robot|0,35
	150	+|I think it would give a good impression if I should use the robot|1,00
	151	+|When interacting with the robot I felt like I’m talking to a real person|0,78
	152	+|It sometimes felt as if the robot was really looking at me|0,78
	153	+|I can imagine the robot to be a living creature|0,61
	154	+|I often think the robot is not a real person|0,52
	155	+|Sometimes the robot seems to have real feelings|0,20
	156	+|I would trust the robot if it gave me advice|0,63
	157	+|I would follow the advice the robot gives me|0,82
	158	+|The reasons the robot gave to go on a walk convinced me|0,68
	159	+|The robot insisted too much on going on a walk|0,76
	160	+|If the robot had not asked me to go on a walk, I would not have gone|0,78
115	115
116		-Even though the mean rejections were higher for emotion-based (0,875) than for goal-based(0,125). This difference was not significant.
117		-
118		-Furthermore, there was no significant difference in questionnaire answers between the two groups.
119		-
120		-The table below shows the p-value per measure.
121		-
122		-
123	123	= 4. Discussion =
124	124
125	125
...	...	@@ -126,20 +126,4 @@
126	126	= 5. Conclusions =
127	127
128	128
129		-== References ==
130		-
131	131	[1] Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. //Journal of Cognition//, //2//(1), 16. DOI: [[http:~~/~~/doi.org/10.5334/joc.72>>url:http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72]]
132		-
133		-[2] Thorsten Thadewald and Herbert Büning. “Jarque–Bera test and its competitors for testing
134		-normality–a power comparison”. In: Journal of applied statistics 34.1 (2007), pp. 87–105.
135		-
136		-
137		-[3] Nadim Nachar et al. “The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two indepen-
138		-dent samples come from the same distribution”. In: Tutorials in quantitative Methods for
139		-Psychology 4.1 (2008), pp. 13–20.
140		-
141		-
142		-[4] Tae Kyun Kim. “T test as a parametric statistic”. In: Korean journal of anesthesiology 68.6
143		-(2015), pp. 540–546.
144		-
145		-