Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10

From version 25.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/03/30 15:16
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 23.1
edited by Hugo van Dijk
on 2023/03/29 22:08
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -110,62 +110,55 @@
110 110  
111 111  = 3. Results =
112 112  
113 -Firstly, the Jarque-Bera test [2] was used to check for normality. When the answers for a question weren't normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U-Test [3] was used. For normally distributed answers, the T-Test [4] was used. These tests used the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the two groups. When the calculated probability value (p-value) is less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the two groups for the answers to that question.
113 +There was no significant difference between the observations and questionnaire answers between the two groups.
114 114  
115 +|**Question / Behaviour**|**P-value**
116 +|Amount of times said no to persuasion|0,17
117 +|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to make mistakes with it|0,09
118 +|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to break something|0,44
119 +|I find the robot scary|0,50
120 +|I find the robot intimidating|0,57
121 +|I think it’s a good idea to use the robot|0,23
122 +|the robot would make my life more interesting|0,60
123 +|It’s good to make use of the robot|1,00
124 +|I have everything I need to make good use of the robot|0,56
125 +|I know enough of the robot to make good use of it|0,60
126 +|I think I’ll use the robot during the next few days|0,30
127 +|I am certain to use the robot during the next few days|0,68
128 +|I’m planning to use the robot during the next few days|0,20
129 +|I think the robot can be adaptive to what I need|0,28
130 +|I think the robot will only do what I need at that particular moment|0,76
131 +|I think the robot will help me when I consider it to be necessary|0,76
132 +|I enjoy the robot talking to me|0,52
133 +|I enjoy doing things with the robot|0,22
134 +|I find the robot enjoyable|0,34
135 +|I find the robot fascinating|0,17
136 +|I find the robot boring|0,28
137 +|I think I will know quickly how to use the robot|0,48
138 +|I find the robot easy to use|0,57
139 +|I think I can use the robot without any help|0,77
140 +|I think I can use the robot when there is someone around to help me|0,83
141 +|I think I can use the robot when I have a good manual|0,37
142 +|I consider the robot a pleasant conversational partner|0,63
143 +|I find the robot pleasant to interact with|0,56
144 +|I feel the robot understands me|0,73
145 +|I think the robot is nice|0,76
146 +|I think the robot is useful to me|0,28
147 +|It would be convenient for me to have the robot|0,56
148 +|I think the robot can help me with many things|0,60
149 +|I think the staff would like me using the robot|0,35
150 +|I think it would give a good impression if I should use the robot|1,00
151 +|When interacting with the robot I felt like I’m talking to a real person|0,78
152 +|It sometimes felt as if the robot was really looking at me|0,78
153 +|I can imagine the robot to be a living creature|0,61
154 +|I often think the robot is not a real person|0,52
155 +|Sometimes the robot seems to have real feelings|0,20
156 +|I would trust the robot if it gave me advice|0,63
157 +|I would follow the advice the robot gives me|0,82
158 +|The reasons the robot gave to go on a walk convinced me|0,68
159 +|The robot insisted too much on going on a walk|0,76
160 +|If the robot had not asked me to go on a walk, I would not have gone|0,78
115 115  
116 -Even though the mean rejections were higher for emotion-based (0,875) than for goal-based(0,125). This difference was not significant.
117 -
118 -Furthermore, there was no significant difference in questionnaire answers between the two groups.
119 -
120 -The table below shows the p-value per measure.
121 -
122 -|**Question / Measure**|**Mean group A**|**Mean group B**|**P-value**
123 -|//Amount of times said no//|//0,875//|//0,125//|//0,17//
124 -|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to make mistakes with it|2,875|3,5|0,09
125 -|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to break something|3,625|3,25|0,44
126 -|I find the robot scary|1,875|2,25|0,50
127 -|I find the robot intimidating|1,875|2,25|0,57
128 -|I think it’s a good idea to use the robot|3,375|3,875|0,23
129 -|the robot would make my life more interesting|3,875|4|0,60
130 -|It’s good to make use of the robot|4|4|1,00
131 -|I have everything I need to make good use of the robot|3,625|3,375|0,56
132 -|I know enough of the robot to make good use of it|3,125|2,75|0,60
133 -|I think I’ll use the robot during the next few days|3,875|3,625|0,30
134 -|I am certain to use the robot during the next few days|3,125|3,25|0,68
135 -|I’m planning to use the robot during the next few days|3,625|3,25|0,20
136 -|I think the robot can be adaptive to what I need|3,625|3,25|0,28
137 -|I think the robot will only do what I need at that particular moment|3,625|3,75|0,76
138 -|I think the robot will help me when I consider it to be necessary|3,75|3,625|0,76
139 -|I enjoy the robot talking to me|4|3,75|0,52
140 -|I enjoy doing things with the robot|3,625|4|0,22
141 -|I find the robot enjoyable|3,75|4|0,34
142 -|I find the robot fascinating|4,25|3,75|0,17
143 -|I find the robot boring|2|2,375|0,28
144 -|I think I will know quickly how to use the robot|3,125|2,75|0,48
145 -|I find the robot easy to use|3,375|3|0,57
146 -|I think I can use the robot without any help|3,25|3|0,77
147 -|I think I can use the robot when there is someone around to help me|4|4,125|0,83
148 -|I think I can use the robot when I have a good manual|3,625|3|0,37
149 -|I consider the robot a pleasant conversational partner|3,25|3,5|0,63
150 -|I find the robot pleasant to interact with|3,875|3,625|0,56
151 -|I feel the robot understands me|3|3,125|0,73
152 -|I think the robot is nice|4,125|4|0,76
153 -|I think the robot is useful to me|3,375|3,75|0,28
154 -|It would be convenient for me to have the robot|3,625|3,875|0,56
155 -|I think the robot can help me with many things|3,375|3|0,60
156 -|I think the staff would like me using the robot|4,25|3,875|0,35
157 -|I think it would give a good impression if I should use the robot|3,75|3,75|1,00
158 -|When interacting with the robot I felt like I’m talking to a real person|2,625|2,5|0,78
159 -|It sometimes felt as if the robot was really looking at me|3,125|3,25|0,78
160 -|I can imagine the robot to be a living creature|3,125|2,75|0,61
161 -|I often think the robot is not a real person|3,25|3|0,52
162 -|Sometimes the robot seems to have real feelings|2,125|2,5|0,20
163 -|I would trust the robot if it gave me advice|2,875|3,125|0,63
164 -|I would follow the advice the robot gives me|3,375|3,25|0,82
165 -|The reasons the robot gave to go on a walk convinced me|3,25|3,5|0,68
166 -|The robot insisted too much on going on a walk|2,25|2,375|0,76
167 -|If the robot had not asked me to go on a walk, I would not have gone|3,875|3,75|0,78
168 -
169 169  = 4. Discussion =
170 170  
171 171  
... ... @@ -172,20 +172,4 @@
172 172  = 5. Conclusions =
173 173  
174 174  
175 -== References ==
176 -
177 177  [1] Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. //Journal of Cognition//, //2//(1), 16. DOI: [[http:~~/~~/doi.org/10.5334/joc.72>>url:http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72]]
178 -
179 -[2] Thorsten Thadewald and Herbert Büning. “Jarque–Bera test and its competitors for testing
180 -normality–a power comparison”. In: Journal of applied statistics 34.1 (2007), pp. 87–105.
181 -
182 -
183 -[3] Nadim Nachar et al. “The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two indepen-
184 -dent samples come from the same distribution”. In: Tutorials in quantitative Methods for
185 -Psychology 4.1 (2008), pp. 13–20.
186 -
187 -
188 -[4] Tae Kyun Kim. “T test as a parametric statistic”. In: Korean journal of anesthesiology 68.6
189 -(2015), pp. 540–546.
190 -
191 -