Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.hjpvandijk
	1	+XWiki.Demibreen1000

Content

...	...	@@ -110,62 +110,7 @@
110	110
111	111	= 3. Results =
112	112
113		-Firstly, the Jarque-Bera test [2] was used to check for normality. When the answers for a question weren't normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U-Test [3] was used. For normally distributed answers, the T-Test [4] was used. These tests used the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the two groups. When the calculated probability value (p-value) is less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the two groups for the answers to that question.
114	114
115		-
116		-Even though the mean rejections were higher for emotion-based (0,875) than for goal-based(0,125). This difference was not significant.
117		-
118		-Furthermore, there was no significant difference in questionnaire answers between the two groups.
119		-
120		-The table below shows the p-value per measure.
121		-
122		-|**Question / Measure**|**Mean group A**|**Mean group B**|**P-value**
123		-|//Amount of times said no//|//0,875//|//0,125//|//0,17//
124		-|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to make mistakes with it|2,875|3,5|0,09
125		-|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to break something|3,625|3,25|0,44
126		-|I find the robot scary|1,875|2,25|0,50
127		-|I find the robot intimidating|1,875|2,25|0,57
128		-|I think it’s a good idea to use the robot|3,375|3,875|0,23
129		-|the robot would make my life more interesting|3,875|4|0,60
130		-|It’s good to make use of the robot|4|4|1,00
131		-|I have everything I need to make good use of the robot|3,625|3,375|0,56
132		-|I know enough of the robot to make good use of it|3,125|2,75|0,60
133		-|I think I’ll use the robot during the next few days|3,875|3,625|0,30
134		-|I am certain to use the robot during the next few days|3,125|3,25|0,68
135		-|I’m planning to use the robot during the next few days|3,625|3,25|0,20
136		-|I think the robot can be adaptive to what I need|3,625|3,25|0,28
137		-|I think the robot will only do what I need at that particular moment|3,625|3,75|0,76
138		-|I think the robot will help me when I consider it to be necessary|3,75|3,625|0,76
139		-|I enjoy the robot talking to me|4|3,75|0,52
140		-|I enjoy doing things with the robot|3,625|4|0,22
141		-|I find the robot enjoyable|3,75|4|0,34
142		-|I find the robot fascinating|4,25|3,75|0,17
143		-|I find the robot boring|2|2,375|0,28
144		-|I think I will know quickly how to use the robot|3,125|2,75|0,48
145		-|I find the robot easy to use|3,375|3|0,57
146		-|I think I can use the robot without any help|3,25|3|0,77
147		-|I think I can use the robot when there is someone around to help me|4|4,125|0,83
148		-|I think I can use the robot when I have a good manual|3,625|3|0,37
149		-|I consider the robot a pleasant conversational partner|3,25|3,5|0,63
150		-|I find the robot pleasant to interact with|3,875|3,625|0,56
151		-|I feel the robot understands me|3|3,125|0,73
152		-|I think the robot is nice|4,125|4|0,76
153		-|I think the robot is useful to me|3,375|3,75|0,28
154		-|It would be convenient for me to have the robot|3,625|3,875|0,56
155		-|I think the robot can help me with many things|3,375|3|0,60
156		-|I think the staff would like me using the robot|4,25|3,875|0,35
157		-|I think it would give a good impression if I should use the robot|3,75|3,75|1,00
158		-|When interacting with the robot I felt like I’m talking to a real person|2,625|2,5|0,78
159		-|It sometimes felt as if the robot was really looking at me|3,125|3,25|0,78
160		-|I can imagine the robot to be a living creature|3,125|2,75|0,61
161		-|I often think the robot is not a real person|3,25|3|0,52
162		-|Sometimes the robot seems to have real feelings|2,125|2,5|0,20
163		-|I would trust the robot if it gave me advice|2,875|3,125|0,63
164		-|I would follow the advice the robot gives me|3,375|3,25|0,82
165		-|The reasons the robot gave to go on a walk convinced me|3,25|3,5|0,68
166		-|The robot insisted too much on going on a walk|2,25|2,375|0,76
167		-|If the robot had not asked me to go on a walk, I would not have gone|3,875|3,75|0,78
168		-
169	169	= 4. Discussion =
170	170
171	171
...	...	@@ -172,20 +172,4 @@
172	172	= 5. Conclusions =
173	173
174	174
175		-== References ==
176		-
177	177	[1] Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. //Journal of Cognition//, //2//(1), 16. DOI: [[http:~~/~~/doi.org/10.5334/joc.72>>url:http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72]]
178		-
179		-[2] Thorsten Thadewald and Herbert Büning. “Jarque–Bera test and its competitors for testing
180		-normality–a power comparison”. In: Journal of applied statistics 34.1 (2007), pp. 87–105.
181		-
182		-
183		-[3] Nadim Nachar et al. “The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two indepen-
184		-dent samples come from the same distribution”. In: Tutorials in quantitative Methods for
185		-Psychology 4.1 (2008), pp. 13–20.
186		-
187		-
188		-[4] Tae Kyun Kim. “T test as a parametric statistic”. In: Korean journal of anesthesiology 68.6
189		-(2015), pp. 540–546.
190		-
191		-