Changes for page b. Test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.Demibreen1000
	1	+XWiki.hjpvandijk

Content

...	...	@@ -110,7 +110,62 @@
110	110
111	111	= 3. Results =
112	112
	113	+Firstly, the Jarque-Bera test [2] was used to check for normality. When the answers for a question weren't normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U-Test [3] was used. For normally distributed answers, the T-Test [4] was used. These tests used the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the two groups. When the calculated probability value (p-value) is less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the two groups for the answers to that question.
113	113
	115	+
	116	+Even though the mean rejections were higher for emotion-based (0,875) than for goal-based(0,125). This difference was not significant.
	117	+
	118	+Furthermore, there was no significant difference in questionnaire answers between the two groups.
	119	+
	120	+The table below shows the p-value per measure.
	121	+
	122	+|**Question / Measure**|**Mean group A**|**Mean group B**|**P-value**
	123	+|//Amount of times said no//|//0,875//|//0,125//|//0,17//
	124	+|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to make mistakes with it|2,875|3,5|0,09
	125	+|If I should use the robot, I would be afraid to break something|3,625|3,25|0,44
	126	+|I find the robot scary|1,875|2,25|0,50
	127	+|I find the robot intimidating|1,875|2,25|0,57
	128	+|I think it’s a good idea to use the robot|3,375|3,875|0,23
	129	+|the robot would make my life more interesting|3,875|4|0,60
	130	+|It’s good to make use of the robot|4|4|1,00
	131	+|I have everything I need to make good use of the robot|3,625|3,375|0,56
	132	+|I know enough of the robot to make good use of it|3,125|2,75|0,60
	133	+|I think I’ll use the robot during the next few days|3,875|3,625|0,30
	134	+|I am certain to use the robot during the next few days|3,125|3,25|0,68
	135	+|I’m planning to use the robot during the next few days|3,625|3,25|0,20
	136	+|I think the robot can be adaptive to what I need|3,625|3,25|0,28
	137	+|I think the robot will only do what I need at that particular moment|3,625|3,75|0,76
	138	+|I think the robot will help me when I consider it to be necessary|3,75|3,625|0,76
	139	+|I enjoy the robot talking to me|4|3,75|0,52
	140	+|I enjoy doing things with the robot|3,625|4|0,22
	141	+|I find the robot enjoyable|3,75|4|0,34
	142	+|I find the robot fascinating|4,25|3,75|0,17
	143	+|I find the robot boring|2|2,375|0,28
	144	+|I think I will know quickly how to use the robot|3,125|2,75|0,48
	145	+|I find the robot easy to use|3,375|3|0,57
	146	+|I think I can use the robot without any help|3,25|3|0,77
	147	+|I think I can use the robot when there is someone around to help me|4|4,125|0,83
	148	+|I think I can use the robot when I have a good manual|3,625|3|0,37
	149	+|I consider the robot a pleasant conversational partner|3,25|3,5|0,63
	150	+|I find the robot pleasant to interact with|3,875|3,625|0,56
	151	+|I feel the robot understands me|3|3,125|0,73
	152	+|I think the robot is nice|4,125|4|0,76
	153	+|I think the robot is useful to me|3,375|3,75|0,28
	154	+|It would be convenient for me to have the robot|3,625|3,875|0,56
	155	+|I think the robot can help me with many things|3,375|3|0,60
	156	+|I think the staff would like me using the robot|4,25|3,875|0,35
	157	+|I think it would give a good impression if I should use the robot|3,75|3,75|1,00
	158	+|When interacting with the robot I felt like I’m talking to a real person|2,625|2,5|0,78
	159	+|It sometimes felt as if the robot was really looking at me|3,125|3,25|0,78
	160	+|I can imagine the robot to be a living creature|3,125|2,75|0,61
	161	+|I often think the robot is not a real person|3,25|3|0,52
	162	+|Sometimes the robot seems to have real feelings|2,125|2,5|0,20
	163	+|I would trust the robot if it gave me advice|2,875|3,125|0,63
	164	+|I would follow the advice the robot gives me|3,375|3,25|0,82
	165	+|The reasons the robot gave to go on a walk convinced me|3,25|3,5|0,68
	166	+|The robot insisted too much on going on a walk|2,25|2,375|0,76
	167	+|If the robot had not asked me to go on a walk, I would not have gone|3,875|3,75|0,78
	168	+
114	114	= 4. Discussion =
115	115
116	116
...	...	@@ -117,4 +117,20 @@
117	117	= 5. Conclusions =
118	118
119	119
	175	+== References ==
	176	+
120	120	[1] Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. //Journal of Cognition//, //2//(1), 16. DOI: [[http:~~/~~/doi.org/10.5334/joc.72>>url:http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72]]
	178	+
	179	+[2] Thorsten Thadewald and Herbert Büning. “Jarque–Bera test and its competitors for testing
	180	+normality–a power comparison”. In: Journal of applied statistics 34.1 (2007), pp. 87–105.
	181	+
	182	+
	183	+[3] Nadim Nachar et al. “The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two indepen-
	184	+dent samples come from the same distribution”. In: Tutorials in quantitative Methods for
	185	+Psychology 4.1 (2008), pp. 13–20.
	186	+
	187	+
	188	+[4] Tae Kyun Kim. “T test as a parametric statistic”. In: Korean journal of anesthesiology 68.6
	189	+(2015), pp. 540–546.
	190	+
	191	+