Skip to Content

Changes for page b. Test

Last modified by Demi Breen on 2023/04/09 15:10
From version 21.1
edited by Demi Breen
on 2023/03/28 11:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 20.1
edited by Demi Breen
on 2023/03/26 19:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
18 18  
19 19  == 2.1 Participants ==
20 20  
21 -The test will be with students from the university of Delft that are also following this course. For the results to be valid 15 participants in a research is the minimum amount as presented by research of Marc Brysbaert (2019) [1]. Since the decision was made for in-between subject design, which will be elaborated more in the Experimental Design section, there are thus 30 participants necessary. Due to the time constraint and the amount of students in the course, 30 participants will probably not be reachable for this experiment so less students will participate. Also the use of a control group is not within reach because of the lack of resources.
21 +The test will be with students from the university of Delft that are also following this course. For the results to be valid 15 participants in the research is the minimum amount. Since the decision was made for in-between subject design, which will be elaborated more in the Experimental Design section, there are thus 30 participants necessary. Due to the time constraint and the amount of students in the course, 30 participants will probably not be reachable for this experiment so less students will participate. Also the use of a control group is not within reach because of the lack of resources.
22 22  
23 23  The participants are all young and do not have any form of dementia. The results of the research can thus not be seen as sufficient for a real-life implementation of the prototype. The students will be familiar with the robot and thus further explanation of the working of the robot is less relevant. Also, the students will feel more comfortable with the robot from the start. This might be very different to the PwD that might be a little hesitant in interacting with the robot. The integration of that aspect will be of great importance before real implementation.
24 24  
... ... @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
50 50  * Step 6: When the walk is finished the participant needs to communicate with Pepper after which Pepper will say goodbye and the actual experiment is over
51 51  * Step 7: After the experiment the participant needs to fill in the questionnaire provided by group 4
52 52  
53 +
53 53  == 2.4 Measures ==
54 54  
55 55  If our situation, we would like to measure whether the provided motivation indeed has effect on the person. We would like to compare which one has more effect as well. That could be measured by seeing whether they indeed go on the walk or not. We would also like to measure how long it takes to convince them to go on a walk when they do not want. We would also like to measure their emotions during and after the walk. Did they enjoy it? Were they bored? Did they feel lonely? That could be measured with the feedback asked after the walk.
... ... @@ -115,6 +115,3 @@
115 115  
116 116  
117 117  = 5. Conclusions =
118 -
119 -
120 -[1] Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. //Journal of Cognition//, //2//(1), 16. DOI: [[http:~~/~~/doi.org/10.5334/joc.72>>url:http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72]]