Changes for page f. Effects

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.Demibreen1000
	1	+XWiki.lwensink

Content

...	...	@@ -1,32 +1,28 @@
1	1	|(% style="width:113px" %)**Upside**|(% style="width:705px" %)(((
2		-**E1.1 Autonomy; **the design will make people with dementia more independent, as they will be able to go on a walk whenever they want. They will not be waiting for the caregivers or family members to take them.
	2	+**The positive effects that could potentially come from our design are:**
3	3
4		-**E1.2 Health;** the design will be beneficial for the health of PwD as it will motivate them to move more often and go outside. Physical exercise and movement stimulate the physical and mental health
	4	+- Independence. PwD may feel a higher degree of independence as a result of being able to walk with the robot, instead of waiting for a family member or caretaker to take them on a walk.
5	5
6		-**E1.3 Social contact; **the robot will be a social company to the PwD, hence they will not feel lonely when they go on a walk. The robot will have a conversation with them optimally about that person's interests.
	6	+- Health benefits. The robot will, hopefully, prompt PwD to move more often and to go outside more often, which means more physical exercise and movement, which has health benefits. This incorporates both physical and mental health.
7	7
8		-**E1.4 Fulfillment;** they will be able to go outside on their own without having to wait for someone else and taking his/her time. They will feel less of a burden and more free. This hopefully gives them a sense of their "normal", "old", life they are used to continuing.
	8	+- Freeing up time. This aspect is considered the caretaker's side. With a robot helping to take residents outside caretakers' time can be spent on more difficult tasks requiring human attention.
9	9
10		-**E1.5 Time management;** the design has also a positive effect on the caregivers and the family member, as it gives them more free time for other tasks and family members.
	10	+- Social stimulation. The robot can, in the cases that it is needed, according to our design also be a social companion and engage in small talk or talk regarding the person's interests. Another idea is potentially gathering multiple PwD in the garden or something like that, which could provide another social opportunity.
11	11
12		-**E1.6 Increase in motivation to be active;** the robot checks whether the PwD has enough activity over time and then starts motivating the PwD to go on a walk. Taking more walks will increase the amount of activity for the PwD
	12	+- Fulfillment. PwD will, hopefully, feel more fulfilled knowing they are able to go outside on their own and move more freely, without having to wait for a person or feel like they are taking up somebody's time. Hopefully, this will make them feel more able and give them a sense of their "normal", "old", life they are used to continuing.
13	13	)))
14	14	|(% style="width:113px" %)**Downside**|(% style="width:705px" %)(((
15		-**E2.1 Ignoring or misunderstanding the prompts;** PwD ignoring the prompts of the robot. This is always a possibility that the prompts or things that the robot says to PwD go ignored, for example, directions of where to go could go ignored. In these cases, we have to consider what exactly would be done in these instances. Also the prompt might be confusing or be misunderstood due to the dementia.
	15	+**The negative effects that could potentially come from our design are:**
16	16
17		-**E2.2 Prompts are perceived as annoying;** this could happen in settings when the patient is asked too many times if they know where they are going, if prompts are improperly timed or if the patient is reminded too often about something. Therefore it is worth considering when exactly prompts should be deployed and whether or not direction prompts are needed if the PwD is following the correct path already.
	17	+- PwD ignoring the prompts of the robot. This is always a possibility that the prompts or things that the robot says to PwD go ignored, for example, directions of where to go could go ignored. In these cases, we have to consider what exactly would be done in these instances.
18	18
19		-**E2.3 PwD feels forced; **monitoring the activity of the PwD and trying to motivate the PwD many times might make the PwD feel that he/she is being forced to go on the activity. The person might think that he/she cannot say no.
	19	+- Prompts being perceived as annoying. This could happen in settings when the patient is asked too many times about if they know where they are going, if prompts are improperly timed or if the patient is reminded too often about something. Therefore it is worth considering when exactly prompts should be deployed and whether or not direction prompts are needed if the PwD is following the correct path already.
20	20
21		-**E2.4 Potential hardware issues; **we need to consider problems that might make our system act wrongfully because sensors or other hardware components don't work the way they should. For example, because of weather conditions, the microphone not taking up speech properly because of noise, or a particular way in which PwD could potentially talk.
	21	+- Potential hardware issues. We need to consider problems that might make our system act wrongfully because sensors or other hardware components don't work the way they should. For example because of weather conditions, or microphone not taking up speech properly because or noise, or a particular way in which PwD could potentially talk.
22	22
23		-**E2.5 Battery has a certain lifespan;** the battery lifespan of the Pepper robot is 12h which is more than enough for a walk, but it is important to consider and plan so that this does not under any circumstances run out during the walk.
	23	+- Battery has a certain lifespan. The battery lifespan of the Pepper robot is 12h which is more than enough for a walk, but it is important to consider and plan so that this does not under any circumstances run out during the walk.
24	24
25		-**E2.6 Privacy issues;** it is important to consider how much should actually be monitored during the walks or how much information the robot needs to have access to since allowing for residents' privacy is also important.
26		-
27		-**E2.7 Physical abilities of the PwD; **the PwD might get really tired of the walk and this can result in negative feelings.
28		-
29		-**E2.8 Negative experiences; **it might be possible that something goes wrong during the walk and a caregiver then needs to intervene. These problems might result in a negative experience and the PwD less willing to go on a walk again the next time.
	25	+- Privacy issues. It is important to consider how much should actually be monitored during the walks or how much information the robot needs to have access to, since allowing for residents privacy is also important.
30	30	)))
31		-|(% style="width:113px" %)**Use Cases**|(% style="width:705px" %)[[UC1.1: Before the walk>>doc:2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.Before the walk.WebHome]], [[UC1.2: During the walk>>doc:2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.ÚC1\.2\: During The Walk .WebHome]], [[UC1.3: After the walk>>doc:2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC1\.3\: After the Walk.WebHome]]
	27	+|(% style="width:113px" %)**Use Cases**|(% style="width:705px" %)
32	32	|(% style="width:113px" %)**Tests**|(% style="width:705px" %)