Wiki source code of Step 4: Claims
Version 5.1 by Hugo van Dijk on 2023/02/15 13:35
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.1 | 1 | |**Topic**|**Question**|**Answer** |
| 2 | |((( | ||
| 3 | [[image:12.png]] | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | //Measurements// | ||
| |
2.1 | 6 | )))|For each positive and negative effect listed in step 3, describe how you could evaluate (measure) whether they actually occur.|((( |
| 7 | Positive: | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | More independence: ask maria for feedback | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | Health measurement accuracy: Measure with caretakers | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| |
4.1 | 15 | Safe walks: count nr of unsafe interactions. Also ask her. |
| |
2.1 | 16 | |
| 17 | |||
| 18 | Caretakers have more time: feedback of caretakers & measure time spent on health related stuff in the retirement home. | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | Less stressed: measure heart rate / blood pressure | ||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | Caretakers feel confident: nr of safe walks. | ||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | Negative: | ||
| 28 | |||
| |
5.1 | 29 | Can ignore robot because it is annoying: Responses to the robot (amount and connotation). |
| |
2.1 | 30 | |
| 31 | |||
| 32 | Robot makes her uncomfortable: Heart rate/ blood pressure. Feedback afterwards. | ||
| 33 | |||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | Any technical issue with the robot: Logs from the robot. Film the walk (maybe). | ||
| |
3.1 | 36 | |
| 37 | |||
| 38 | Ethical stuff: measure social reaction. Feedback | ||
| |
4.1 | 39 | |
| 40 | Replace family members/caretakers: No actual people go with other on walks anymore. | ||
| |
2.1 | 41 | ))) |
![]() |
1.1 | 42 | |((( |
| 43 | [[image:14.png]] | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | //Benchmark// | ||
| |
4.1 | 46 | )))|For each measurement, what are the benchmarks (criteria)? (i.e., what are desired values?)|((( |
| 47 | Indepencence: rate 4/5 | ||
| 48 | |||
| 49 | Helath measurement accuracy: sugar level 95% within healthy range. | ||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | |||
| 52 | Safe walks: 0 preventable incidents per walk. | ||
| 53 | |||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | Caretakers have more free time: Save at least 1.5 hours. | ||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | Less stressed: 95% average | ||
| 59 | |||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | Caretakers feel confident: all walks | ||
| |
5.1 | 62 | |
| 63 | |||
| 64 | Can ignore robot: Responds to 80% of the questions of the robot and 80% has to be positive. | ||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | Any technical issue: 0 issues per walk. | ||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | Ethical stuff: on average positive reaction. | ||
| 71 | |||
| 72 | |||
| 73 | Replace family members/ caretakers: walk with person at least 2x a week. Use personal logs. | ||
| |
4.1 | 74 | ))) |
![]() |
1.1 | 75 | |((( |
| 76 | |||
| 77 | |||
| 78 | [[image:13.png]] | ||
| 79 | |||
| 80 | //Demonstration of AI-functionality// | ||
| |
4.1 | 81 | )))|Can you describe how you could demonstrate that your AI function (s) achieve(s) the effects that you listed in the previous question?|((( |
| 82 | Health statistics and feedback statistics. | ||
| 83 | |||
| 84 | Time measurements. | ||
| 85 | |||
| 86 | |||
| 87 | ))) |
