Project homeWiki source code of Hugo
Version 2.1 by Hugo van Dijk on 2023/02/22 11:53
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Notes paper 2 week 3.2 | ||
| 2 | The Design and Evaluation of a Robotic e-Partner | ||
| 3 | Engaging People with Dementia in Joint Activities | ||
| 4 | with Music | ||
| 5 | Mark A. Neerincx · Ismini Psychoula · | ||
| 6 | Marieke M. M. Peeters · Bernd Kreynen · | ||
| 7 | Catharine Oertel | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | * . Additionally, Chang et al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot. | ||
| 10 | * Paro was evaluated more positively, whereas the Guide robot could be improved in terms of making it more simple and improving its ergonomics | ||
| 11 | * Hebesberger et al. [16] investigated the use of a robot as a walking group as- | ||
| 12 | sistant at a care site accompanying adults with advanced dementia. The robot | ||
| 13 | offered visual and acoustic stimulation. The findings suggested that a robot has | ||
| 14 | the potential to enhance motivation, group coherence, and also mood within the | ||
| 15 | walking group |