Changes for page Hugo

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,33 +1,9 @@
1		-Notes paper 2 week 3.2
2		-The Design and Evaluation of a Robotic e-Partner
3		-Engaging People with Dementia in Joint Activities
4		-with Music
5		-Mark A. Neerincx · Ismini Psychoula ·
6		-Marieke M. M. Peeters · Bernd Kreynen ·
7		-Catharine Oertel
	1	+Personal reflection:
8	8
9		-* . Additionally, Chang et al. [11] tested the Paro robot in a nursing home in an 8-weeks trial and observed an increased willingness amongst participants to interact with the robot.
10		-* Paro was evaluated more positively, whereas the Guide robot could be improved in terms of making it more simple and improving its ergonomics
11		-* Hebesberger et al. [16] investigated the use of a robot as a walking group as-
12		-sistant at a care site accompanying adults with advanced dementia. The robot
13		-offered visual and acoustic stimulation. The findings suggested that a robot has
14		-the potential to enhance motivation, group coherence, and also mood within the
15		-walking group
16		-* For exercise and reminiscence
17		-* Music bingo
18		-* Robot becomes point of discussion & conversation
19		-* Used NAO robot
20		-* One participant being negative towards the robot can influence the rest.
21		-* Caretaker stresses that caretaker interference is needed for PwD to keep interacting with robot.
22		-* Ppl had trouble following movemenents sometimes.
23		-* Remenicense exercise made PwD active.
24		-* One participant scared of robot when it talked after being quiet for some time.
25		-* Caretaker states robot's main purpose should be conversational interaction, not exercise.
26		-* Robot should have less monotonic voice.
27		-* Ppl remembered robot but not the music/singing/dancing.
28		-* Ppl respond more to music than engage in talking
29		-* Not clear if positive effect on people's state.
30		-* Potentially, inviting to dance better effect than structured exercise.
31		-* Positive effect on cognitive activity.
32		-* Robot itself not perse positive effect on social interaction, but music does.
33		-* Over course of sessions, ppl interacted less with robot and more with each other. If not like robot from start ~-~-> stopped with study. Other ppl displayed continuously high interest levels.
	3	+When assigning roles for the group members the others proposed me as team leader. I think this fits me well and I happily accepted the role.
	4	+
	5	+When deciding on the direction of our research we landed quite soon on a sort of guidance robot for PwD to go outside. We initially thought it would be nice for the robot to manage the safety of the route, including traffic monitoring, however we got the comment that this might be too futuristic. Hence we changed it to a motivator to have PwD go for a walk in the garden and be a social companion and route guide during.
	6	+
	7	+I like the aspect of having to closely think about your user group and the iterative process of designing for your users.
	8	+
	9	+(8/3) I think we have a solid idea of what we want to do. Now we have to get familiar with the robot interface and design the interaction and system.